Why is the AstraZeneca share price down nearly 8% this week?

AstraZeneca’s share price has fallen this week on concerns around the trial of the coronavirus vaccine it is developing with Oxford University.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Syringe and vial on blue background

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) shares closed at 8,317p on Friday, 20 November. At the time of writing, shares in the UK pharmaceutical giant are changing hands for around 7,685p. That means the AstraZeneca share price has fallen by 7.6% in a week.

Last week encouraging results emerged from trials to test the effectiveness of the vaccine developed by the partnership of Oxford University and AstraZeneca. However, this week has seen concerns raised about the trial. The fall in AstraZeneca’s share price over the course of this week is a result of those concerns.

AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine trial

AstraZeneca reported that its AZD122 coronavirus vaccine had met its primary efficacy endpoint in preventing Covid-19 on 23 November 2020. On average, subjects given the vaccine developed 70% fewer cases of Covid-19 than those in the placebo group. But, there were, in fact, two dosing regimes. A half dose was given to 2,741 people, followed by a full dose of the vaccine 28 days later. Also, two full doses were given to 11,636 people a month apart. A 90% efficacy was reported for the half-dose regimen, and 62% for the full-dose one.

The disquiet around the results of the vaccine trial centre around the two-dosing regimens. Giving a half-dose followed by a full one seems to be the optimal dosing schedule based on the 90% efficacy. However, the number of subjects in the half-dose group was relatively small, and the efficacy of 90% could be an anomaly. It turns out that the half-dose regimen came about by mistake. Oxford University announced this Wednesday that a manufacturing problem — which has been fixed — was the reason for half-doses being given to some trial participants.

If a half then full dose was given to a small subset of participants, there might not be enough evidence to approve the seemingly optimal dosing regimen for AZD122. But the increased efficacy might also disappear with further study, which would bring the average closer to the 62% reported for the full-dose group.

AstraZeneca share price effectiveness

Regulators have set a threshold of 50% for vaccine approval. So, AZD122 would appear to be still able to surpass that. But the dosing issue is likely to at least delay approval. Data gathering and analysis continue. Still, it remains to be seen how the two dosing arms of the study can be reconciled. Reconciliation is needed to arrive at a true picture of the optimal dose of AZD122 and its effectiveness.

Analysts have reported that AZD122 could be worth around $1.5bn a year in sales to AstraZeneca. Investors will be concerned about the delay or potential loss of that revenue. That has put pressure on AstraZeneca’s share price. However, it’s worth pointing out that since hitting an all-time high of 10,120p on 20 July 2020, AstraZeneca’s share has been losing ground. This week’s price action does not mark a sudden reversal in AstraZeneca’s fortunes. Were those highs hit based on unrealistic expectations of what a coronavirus vaccine could bring to AstraZeneca’s bottom line? After all, $1.5bn of revenue sounds like a lot, but it would grow 2019 revenues by a rather more modest 6%. Is that alone enough to justify the AstraZeneca share price trading at 56 times 2019 earnings per share?

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

James J. McCombie has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »