Investing in oil: I wonder if a BP-Shell merger could be a possibility?

With oil investing in bearish territory, M&A rumours abound. All eyes are on the majors and whether their rock-bottom share prices are a gamble.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

With the crude oil price stagnating around $40 for the past few months and no solution to Covid-19 yet in sight, investing in oil is a risky business and oil companies are out of favour with investors.

Premier Oil is merging with Chrysaor, and rumours abound that Tullow Oil might be next in line for a takeover. No less than 36 US oil and gas companies had declared bankruptcy by August. But with pressure piling on, even the majors are in trouble and as both Royal Dutch Shell (LSE:RDSB) and BP (LSE:BP) appear to be struggling, could a merger be on the cards?

It’s not out of the question. Back in 2004, a recognised energy analyst, Fadel Gheit, argued BP would make an ideal merger partner for Shell. Of course, it never transpired, and both continued to forge their own paths. But for BP and Shell, those paths seem to be increasingly similar.

Shifting from investment in oil

There is massive pressure on oil giants to clean up their act and move into renewable energy. The pressure comes from governments, activists, shareholders and consumers. All of whom are increasingly aware of the need to ‘save the planet’. Rystad Energy reports that the oil majors will need to streamline their portfolios massively if they want to improve cash flow, cost efficiency, and maintain their competitive edge.

Shell is restructuring and focusing closely on reducing costs to reach its net zero target by 2050. It confirmed this will mean changing the types of products it sells, such as low-carbon electricity and biofuels, hydrogen and more. BP is doing the same. They are now working towards very similar goals and a merger would allow for major cost-cutting initiatives to progress. It would also help them achieve their carbon-neutral targets more efficiently. 

No strangers to M&A

It may come as a surprise, but in the UK between 1932 and 1975, BP and Shell were merged in a joint marketing venture known as Shell-Mex and BP. It stopped making sense as the two companies were building independent paths internationally.

In 1998, BP merged with Amoco, in a deal considered the largest oil industry merger ever, worth around $48bn. At which time, BP Amoco became the largest UK company, with a market cap above $140bn. It also became the largest producer of oil and natural gas in the US. Shell is no stranger to mergers either, most recently its acquisition of BG Group, a UK oil and gas production company, which completed in 2016. 

As BP and Shell have long been considered rivals, there may be alternative companies that shareholders would deem a better fit for an M&A process. Other supermajors I think may consider a proposition are Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Eni, ExxonMobil, or Total. 

BP has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 13, earnings per share are 15p and its dividend yield is around 8%. Shell’s P/E is 6, EPS is £1.52 and the dividend yield is 5%. BP currently has a market cap of $42bn and Shell’s is around $35bn, confirming they’re no longer the giants they once were. Nevertheless, I think they still have plenty to offer and I’d buy shares in either of these companies. They have decades of experience under their belts, are restructuring to ensure survival, and they maintain a global reach.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Kirsteen owns shares of BP and Royal Dutch Shell B. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »