Could the Barclays share price really have further to fall?

Here’s the shocking truth, as I see it, about how low the Barclays (LON: BARC) share price could go in the current economic crisis. Here’s what I’d do now.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Banks

Image: Public domain: Fair use

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

At 87p, the Barclays (LSE: BARC) share price is around 50% lower than it was in mid-February. That’s a big plunge, but the stock has been lower.

For example, in the wake of the financial crisis of the noughties, the shares were briefly changing hands around 50p at the beginning of 2009. If Barclay’s revisits those lows, it implies the possibility of a further plunge of more than 40% from current levels.

Will the Barclays share price shoot up again?

That might sound whacky when you consider the firm’s tempting-looking valuation indicators. Indeed, the price, measured against earnings and assets, looks low. But the UK’s economy has a huge financial shock to digest because of the coronavirus lockdown. Many also expect a deep recession.

Does that remind you of 2009? Conditions were similar back then – a huge financial shock followed by a deep recession.

And being the out-and-out cyclical business it is, Barclays tends to be one of the early movers both into and out of recessions. That’s why the plunge recently has been so dramatic. Barclays shares are highly responsive to changes in general economic conditions or to investors’ perceptions about those conditions.

I don’t see much use for the London-listed bank shares as long-term holdings. And I wouldn’t buy them for growth or income from shareholder dividends. But, to me, they can be useful for riding the next up-leg of a general economic cycle.

However, investing like that requires aiming to time your purchase and sell orders. And to be honest, that’s not a great way to proceed. I’d rather ignore the banks altogether and look for ‘proper’ business to invest in. Those with decent, value-generating trading businesses backing them. For example, in the FTSE 100, names such as Diageo, Unilever, SSE, and many others.

Nevertheless, Barclays could shoot up fast when a general economic recovery starts to look possible. Between the beginning of 2009 and the summer of that year, the stock blasted up by around 300%. Sadly, I think a move of that magnitude seems unlikely following the current crisis.

Dividends halted

Since hitting its peak early in the middle of 2009, Barclays has been locked in a wiggly down-trend ever since. And the value indicators have been looking attractive nearly all the way down. My guess is that many investors in the stock market are wary of banks. We’ve seen their cyclicality. We don’t trust them.

On the 1 April, Barclays notified us it cancelled the 2019 dividend and suspended shareholder dividend payments for the rest of 2020. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) required all the major UK banks to preserve capital that way. And for good reason. There are difficult financial times ahead.

I admit cancelled dividends, plunging earnings, and a fallen share price are good indicators of a potential cyclical bottom for Barclays. But I wouldn’t rule out the share falling a lot further. And I’d rather invest in other cyclical shares, such as the FTSE 100’s Ferguson and Whitbread before risking my hard-earned on a bank like Barclays.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any share mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended Unilever. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays and Diageo. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »