Why I’d still shun the Woodford Patient Capital share price at 45p

G A Chester discusses why he’d still avoid Woodford Patient Capital Trust plc (LON:WPCT) at a 40% discount to NAV.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Just to rub salt into the wounds of embattled fund manager Neil Woodford, the FTSE powers that be last night confirmed his Patient Capital Trust (LSE: WPCT) is to be kicked out of the FTSE 250 index.

The move follows a 39% collapse in the growth trust’s share price since the last quarterly review of the FTSE indexes. The shares closed yesterday at 45p, representing a discount of 40% to its last published net asset value (NAV) of 74.43p.

On paper, Patient Capital appears to offer great value. Here, I’ll explain why I see it as a stock to avoid.

Discount

A month before the gating of his flagship Equity Income fund in June, I warned readers the House of Neil Woodford could be about to collapse. I’d been bearish on his Patient Capital Trust from way back in January 2018 (when the shares were 83p and trading at a discount of less than 10% to NAV), explaining why I believed the discount should be much wider.

However, due to the ramifications of the gating of his Equity Income fund, which has significant cross-holdings with Patient Capital, even the current 40% discount isn’t wide enough to tempt me.

Cornerstone investors under pressure

Woodford is in the process of clearing out the unlisted stocks from his Equity Income fund to raise cash in order to meet redemptions when the fund is ungated. Meanwhile, he’s also a seller with his Patient Capital hat on, having agreed with the trust’s board to clear a maxed-out £150m overdraft within 12 months.

Elsewhere, IP Group, another early-stage investment company, is backed by Woodford, as well as being a fellow cornerstone investor in many of the same unlisted companies. IP’s shares have also collapsed to a steep discount to NAV, making it difficult for it to raise fresh cash to support the investee companies.

Another under-pressure cornerstone investor is Invesco Perpetual. When Woodford left Invesco, he left his protégé Mark Barnett with big positions in many of the same unlisted companies he went on to buy for Patient Capital and his new Equity Income fund.

Omnishambles

With Woodford now a seller and key fellow cornerstone investors not best placed to take shares off his hands, the valuation of the investee companies will inevitably come under pressure. Any new investor willing to relieve Woodford of his shares will want a hefty discount.

Furthermore, with many of the investee companies being loss-making, and requiring more rounds of funding to have any hope of reaching commerciality, it’s not in their interest to see Woodford sell his shares to a new investor. This raises no cash for the companies themselves.

Far better for them to keep Woodford locked in by offering any interested investor new shares at a discount to Woodford’s selling price. This raises cash for the companies, rather than for Woodford, but puts further downward pressure on their valuation and on Patient Capital’s NAV.

Frankly, I think the situation is an omnishambles, and it’s impossible to estimate what Patient Capital’s true NAV might end up as when everything’s played out. For now, I see the trust as uninvestable.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

G A Chester has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »