Why the BT share price fell 14% in August

G A Chester discusses the slump in BT Group – Class A Common Stock (LON:BT.A), and gives his view on the company’s valuation and prospects.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

August wasn’t a good month for investors in BT (LSE: BT-A). The shares fell 14%, compared with a 5% decline in the FTSE 100. In this article, I’ll discuss why the share price slumped, and the company’s current valuation and prospects.

Let’s start by summarising the key features of the month:

  • Shares ended July at 193.2p.
  • 2 August — Q1 results (share price down 3.3% on day to 186.7p, and continued to trend lower in subsequent weeks).
  • 23 August — UBS analysts maintained ‘neutral’ rating on stock, but slashed target price to 165p from 240p (shares ended day at new multi-year low of 158.9p).
  • Price recovered a little to end month at 165.6p.

Results

BT’s Q1 numbers actually came in ahead of the consensus forecast of City analysts. Revenue dipped 1% to £5.63bn, marginally ahead of expectations of £5.59bn, and there was a 4% beat on adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA). This edged down from £1.98bn to £1.96bn versus expectations of a drop to £1.89bn.

If the performance was better than expected, why has the market responded so negatively? I think there are a number of factors.

Uncertainties

BT’s wholesale Openreach business was largely responsible for the Q1 beat. However, the performance of Consumer was below expectations. The company said on the conference call that the consumer market is “significantly more competitive and aggressive than last year.”

Analysts at Morgan Stanley, who described the conference call as “subdued,” noted that “management acknowledged that the business still faces significant uncertainties ahead.”

I think one of the biggest uncertainties weighing on market sentiment right now is how the company intends to fund its investment plans, particularly with it having indicated it could roll out fibre faster than previously expected. Management has vowed to hold the dividend for this year and next at 15.4p, but with this giving a yield of 9.2% at the current share price, the market is clearly pricing in a dividend cut to help fund investment.

Bargain basement

My Foolish colleague Royston Wild slated BT’s Q1 performance and prospects. He said if he owned shares, he’d sell them without delay. In the short term that’s been a good call, but I’m more optimistic about the longer-term outlook, particularly at the current valuation.

The shares are trading at a bargain-basement 6.9 times this year’s forecast earnings. I expect the dividend to be cut at some point, and would welcome it. For example, a rebasing of the annual 15.4p payout to 10p would free up £500m for investment, and still give buyers of the shares today a handsome yield of 6%.

Chief executive Philip Jansen only joined the company in January. He made his name by highly effective capital allocation for growth at Worldpay, and I think as we get more concrete details on his plans for BT, market sentiment will improve.

Right now, the market and many analysts (including the aforementioned UBS, which slashed its target price in August) appear to see a lack of catalysts for a near-term re-rating of the shares. However, with Jansen’s record at Worldpay, and BT having competitive advantages it’s yet to fully exploit, I rate the shares a ‘buy’ for the long term.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

G A Chester has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »