Is Purplebricks a turnaround ‘buy’ or on borrowed time?

At some point, bears could turn into bulls over Purplebricks Group plc (LON: PURP). Is that time now?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

I wrote about hybrid estate agency Purplebricks Group (LSE: PURP) in December 2018, asking the question: “Will 2019 be the year to return to Neil Woodford favourite Purplebricks?”

My conclusion back then was that, on top of being loss-making, the firm’s business is also cyclical, “and a cyclical downturn could put the company in an extremely precarious position if it arrives.” I viewed the stock as ‘risky’, and had no plans to buy.

More dire figures

Today, the company released its full-year results for the year to 30 April, and the figures are grim. Meanwhile, the share price has slipped down a further 35% or so since my December article, so I’m pleased to have avoided the stock. But what now? Is continuing to shun Purplebricks still the right decision? Let’s look deeper.

I’m discouraged by the numbers. Compared to the previous year, revenue rose 55% to £136.5m, which seems to be an outcome driven by the firm’s strategy aimed at grabbing an ever-increasing share of the market. However, the operating loss increased by 88% to £52.3m.

Call me old-fashioned, but what’s the point in that kind of trading? Imagine running a smaller business such as a corner shop like that. The firm is losing money hand over fist.

To me, there’s no point in increasing revenue unless the operating profit is rising as well. We could say that Purplebricks is effectively ‘buying’ its higher sales. Indeed, the cash in the firm’s coffers plunged by 59% during the year from £152.8m to £62.8m.

That money is gone from the balance sheet forever. I hope existing shareholders feel all the frenetic sales activity has been worth it. Maybe the enjoyment of watching the company’s funny TV ads and the brief warm glow that they got from reading about this year’s higher revenue figure is compensation enough for the plunge in the share price!

I think there’s a big flaw in the strategy

Is Purplebricks trying to follow the Amazon strategy? The US-based mega-company started off as an online bookshop and rapidly grew to sell just about everything. Famously, the company paid scant attention to profitability and focused on growing market share. For many years, Amazon remained loss-making but became profitable in the end after growing into a huge business.

But there’s a big difference between the two companies, in that Purplebricks is operating in a dreadful sector. Estate agency is notoriously cyclical and tied to the fortunes of the property market. I remember in the eighties, one particular downturn led to the call “retrain estate agents!” My view is the property market looks dangerous and I see Purplebricks as being in a precarious position.

Cyclical companies ‘should’ be making hay while the sun shines. So, right now, Purplebricks should be stuffing its bank account with cash from strong incoming cash flow. That’s because it will need it to survive the next downturn in the market, the possibility of which stands over the firm like the Grim Reaper, in my view. Sadly, the firm is doing the opposite.

I’ve run out of space, but you can read the rest of today’s report from the company here, for what it’s worth. Needless to say, I’m continuing to avoid the stock, at least until the operating loss starts to reduce.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any share mentioned.  The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »