Is this former FTSE 100 stock doomed?

Shares in Thomas Cook Group plc (LON:TCG) tank again. Paul Summers takes a look at today’s woeful half-year numbers.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

It’s not easy being a UK-based holiday operator in 2019. Just ask Thomas Cook (LSE: TCG) and any investor still clinging to its shares.

At the close of play yesterday, the former travel titan’s share price was down 85% from one year ago thanks to a spate of profit warnings and ongoing political and economic uncertainty.

Today’s interim numbers, while never likely to be pretty, haven’t helped matters. The stock is being hammered once again as I type.

Is the writing on the wall for the former FTSE 100 constituent?

Battered by Brexit

Despite revenue of just over £3bn in the six months to the end of March being “in line” with that achieved last year, an underlying loss from operations of £245m was reported due to margin pressures. 

All told, the company booked a £1.46bn pre-tax loss after also writing down the value from the merger of its UK business with MyTravel 12 years ago. 

Reflecting on today’s results, CEO Peter Fankhauser stated that there was “little doubt” that the uncertainty around our EU departure had stopped UK customers from booking their summer holidays.

Ominously, the mid-cap also stated that promotional activity, combined with higher hotel and fuel costs, would put a drag on profits for the full year. 

News of “good progress” elsewhere — such as multiple bids for its airline business, the opening of 12 hotels and progress on joint ventures in China and Russia — did little to stop the flood of sellers.

It’s clearly no surprise that Thomas Cook is now making every effort to reduce costs where it can.

A total of 21 retail stores have been shut so far with a review of its foreign currency business also under way. 

Separately, the company has now agreed to a £300m bank facility with its lenders to help it through this winter. Worryingly, net debt already stands at £1.25bn with the company valued at only £350m yesterday. 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, I’m not a fan of the shares, even if they were trading on a little over 3 times forecast earnings before markets opened.

While there will always be some bargains out there, I suggest that Thomas Cook isn’t one of them. 

It might not be doomed but I’ll be leaving this one to the traders.

Better prospects

Of course, there are better bets for those committed to investing in the sector. Online operator On the Beach (LSE: OTB) is an example. 

Despite enduring the same uncertainties as Thomas Cook, the company reported a 41% jump in revenue (to £63.5m) and 14% increase in adjusted pre-tax profit (£15.7m) in its half-year figures on Tuesday. An 18% hike to the interim dividend was also announced.

It wasn’t all sunshine and smiles. Although only a small part of the business, revenue from overseas fell by 56% to just £400,000 after the Icelandic airline Primera Air collapsed into administration in October.

While a larger company than it was a few years ago, much of On the Beach’s appeal remains its flexible business model and the lack of huge costs that come from running hotels and keeping aircraft maintained.

That said, prospective buyers should consider just how likely it is that this advantage might be eroded by rivals over time, not to mention the cyclicality of the travel stocks generally.

Currently, On the Beach’s shares change hands for 18 times forecast full-year earnings.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Paul Summers has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended On The Beach. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »