This is Neil Woodford’s take on Imperial Brands’ share price drop

Imperial Brands plc’s (LON: IMB) share price has taken a beating over the last 18 months. Here are Neil Woodford’s thoughts on the stock.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Imperial Brands’ (LSE: IMB) share price has suffered an extraordinary decline over the last 18 months. Back in September 2016, it was a FTSE 100 company that everyone wanted to own. The stock had risen spectacularly over a five-year period and was trading above 4,000p. However, since then, sentiment towards the £22bn market cap tobacco manufacturer has changed dramatically, with the shares today changing hands under 2,400p today.

At that price, Imperial trades on a forward-looking P/E ratio of under 9, and sports a dividend yield of around 8%. So what on earth is going on? Is the FTSE 100 stock a bargain or is the company in trouble?

Here’s fund manager Neil Woodford’s take.

The wrong price

He believes the market has got it wrong with Imperial. In a February update, Woodford Investment Management posted the following comment on its website in relation to the tobacco giant:

Current market conditions have not been favourable for Imperial Brands, which has been a deeply unpopular stock. Nevertheless, from a fundamental perspective, Imperial Brands continues to be a business which should deliver attractive and sustainable long-term dividend growth, as it has done throughout its history as a quoted, independent business. With the share price revisiting valuation territory that we haven’t seen in many years, Imperial Brands simply looks like it is trading at the wrong price.”

Furthermore, in relation to Imperial’s February AGM statement, Woodford Investment Management commented: “Overall, the update is as expected and it suggests that the business is in far better shape than its share price and valuation would suggest.”

Clearly, Woodford and his team believe that Imperial is oversold at present. And it appears that they are not afraid to put their money where their mouths are. Imperial is currently the top holding in both Woodford’s Equity Income Fund and his Income Focus fund with weightings of 6.75% and 6.96% respectively.

So, has he got it right or could this turn out to be another disaster like Provident Financial?

Oversold

While I don’t always agree with Woodford’s calls, I believe that on this occasion he has got it right. Imperial simply looks way oversold at current levels.

There are no doubt concerns about the long-term profitability of the industry, but the fact remains that Imperial is a cash generative business capable of paying out sizeable dividends to shareholders. In its recent AGM statement, the group advised that “cash generation remains strong, underpinning our 10% growth. ”

Imperial’s dividend growth track record is outstanding, having recorded nine consecutive dividend increases of 10% now. And with a payout ratio of 64% last year, the dividend does not look at risk.

For me, a classic contrarian indicator here is last week’s downgrade from Goldman Sachs in which the investment bank cut its stance on Imperial from ‘buy’ to ‘neutral.’ I find this quite incredible. Surely, it would have been more appropriate to downgrade the stock to neutral when it was trading above 4,000p, and not after a 40% share price decline?

For long-term investors, today’s share price and dividend yield look to offer strong long-term value, in my opinion.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Edward Sheldon owns shares in Imperial Brands. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Imperial Brands. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »