RAC Pulls Out Of Quindell PLC Joint Venture

The RAC sells its share in its Quindell PLC (LON: QPP) telematics joint venture.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

quindellBeleagured insurance claims processor Quindell (LSE: QPP) announced this morning that the co-ownership of its joint venture with the RAC is over.

The venture, Connected Car Solutions (CCS), with a target of getting two million telematics black boxes installed in cars on the UK’s roads, had been hailed as a major step forward for Quindell’s prospects.

No rollout

But on 2 September, Quindell announced that “Due to market conditions beyond the control of either Quindell or RAC, the parties have concluded that it is not the best use of capital for either party to finance a free telematics roll out to consumers as initially planned“, and that Quindell is to buy out the RAC’s share of CCS. There will be a net cost to Quindell of ÂŁ3.5m.

Problems with the deal were revealed by the Financial Times on 4 August, but Quindell was quick to dismiss the report as overblown. And chairman Robert Terry rather shockingly told the Telegraph that the RAC venture was “hardly a focus“, in contrast to his earlier statement that it was going to “revolutionise the insurance industry”.

Quindell has also been under fire as its cashflow has not come close to its reported profits, and although that did improve with the firm’s first-half results, uncollected receivables soared to ÂŁ560m.

Tell it straight

The evasive way Quindell went about this will surely have further darkened its already dim reputation for openness and transparency. And if a company is going to be so mealy-mouthed when it comes to something as important to its shareholders as a “revolutionary” joint venture, it will surely have people further scratching their heads about those uncollected receivables and how much will actually turn into cash.

We also have to wonder whether the RAC had any fears that its close association with Quindell might have been damaging to its own planned flotation, which is expected to value it at around ÂŁ2bn. Quindell had famously failed in its attempt to gain a main market listing, ostensibly because its rapid growth had prevented the required prior three years of stability — but the firm went on to recognise that its corporate governance also needed a bit of a makeover.

Buy the shares?

The big question comes down to whether Quindell shares are a Buy now — I already took a risk and added some to the Fool’s Beginners’ Portfolio in June.

The negatives are all still there — the famous Gotham City Research report that slated the company’s governance, the short-selling attacks, the LSE listing failure, the mounting uncollected receivables, and the weasel approach to the RAC developments.

But on the other hand, dropping the costs of the free telematics rollout will help with cashflow — and investors have pushed Quindell shares up 6.5p (3.8%) to 175.5p at the time I write these words. At that level, they’re on a price to earnings ratio of only three on year-end forecasts, dropping to a smidgen over two for 2015!

A calculated risk

If the truth lies, as I suspect, close to midway between the Quindell board’s optimistic pronouncements and the naysayers’ pessimism, then I reckon that’s still way too low a valuation — and I’m happy to keep it in the Beginners’ Portfolio as a recovery/growth punt. But that’s just my opinion — you need to make up your own mind if you’re stumping up actual cash.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »