Are GSK shares a buy after the Haleon demerger?

GSK shares plummeted last Monday, but this reflected the company’s demerger with Haleon. So what should I make of the new GSK?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Engineer Project Manager Talks With Scientist working on Computer

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

GlaxoSmithKline (LSE:GSK) shares have been up and down over the past week, but this doesn’t reflect market sentiment. It’s because of a huge demerger with its consumer healthcare business, Haleon.

The pharma and biotech giant is now free of its consumer healthcare division, which some experts see as a good thing. After all, GSK had underperformed for years.

So is it time for a GSK renaissance, and is this stock right for my portfolio?

Will the demerger benefit GSK?

GSK and its consumer healthcare business, now Haleon, are two very different companies. One is a pharma/biotech firm that invests billions in long-lasting drug and vaccine development programmes. On many occasions, the drug or vaccine doesn’t even make it to market. So this is a capital-intensive business that won’t necessarily have a steady stream of revenue.

Meanwhile, Haleon is a fast-moving consumer goods business. It doesn’t spend billions on product development and puts a lot more emphasis on marketing its products. After all, its selling to high street customers and not governments or healthcare trusts.

So clearly the demerger should allow GSK to focus on its long-term investment projects, prioritising the development of innovative vaccines and speciality medicines.

Prospects

In recent years, GSK’s pharma and biotech business has lagged its peers in certain areas. HIV drugs and vaccines have done well, but it has underperformed in sectors like oncology, an area in which it is trying to speed up right now, partially through acquisitions.

Earlier this year, GSK bought Sierra Oncology — a late-stage biopharmaceutical company based in San Mateo, California. The firm has a candidate drug for bone marrow cancer. It is projected that peak demand could see this treatment bring in around £1.3bn a year.

GSK also received a £7bn payout from the Haleon demerger. The capital will be likely to used to fund drug development and acquisitions. And this is particularly important as GSK needs to fill a void as patents on certain drugs run out. For example, its patent exclusivity on dolutegravir — an HIV drug, worth about £3bn a year — will end in 2027.

More broadly, long-term trends suggest that demand for drugs, vaccines and other medical treatments will increase as the global population, especially in wealthier Western nations, grows older.

But it’s also the case that people in Western nations are increasingly inactive and many are clueless that their diets will likely lead to long-term health problems. Therefore, I’m particularly bullish on pharma and biotech in the long run.

Risks

GSK has been an underperformer for a while, and there is no guarantee its performance will improve without Haleon. So only time will tell on this one although, personally, I see the demerger as a beneficial move for both companies.

Would I buy GSK stock?

Is GSK stock right for my portfolio? Owing to the points made above, I think this stock is a good match and I’d buy it today. I’m positive on its new structure and its development objectives within the context of increasing demand for drugs, vaccines and other treatments.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

James Fox has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »