Should BT shares have a place in every retirement portfolio?

Christopher Ruane explains why he does not hold BT shares in his retirement portfolio — and the general principle that choice underlines when it comes to individual investment decisions.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Smiling senior white man talking through telephone while using laptop at desk.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

A lot of people invest in shares for retirement. That can be directly, though a pension plan, or more subtly, by owning shares simply in the hope of generating wealth for later life. Some shares are quite common in a variety of investors’ pension plans, from Rolls-Royce to BT (LSE: BT-A). Thanks to its high profile privatisation, BT became a popular holding with private shareholders and many people continue to hold BT shares.

Here I want to explain how I approach the role of BT shares in my retirement portfolio.

Building a retirement portfolio

At the moment I do not own BT shares. I have never owned them – and as of today at least, I have no plans to buy them in the future.

Clearly, then, I do not think that BT shares have a place in every retirement portfolio. But why not? After all, utilities are typically seen as having defensive qualities that help make them popular with people investing for retirement. As a former telecoms monopoly still with a very strong market position, BT is a classic utility.

One thing about defensive stocks I think often gets overlooked is that what is seen as defensive changes over time. For example, fixed-line telecoms saw strong, sustained customer demand a couple of decades ago. Since then, a lot has changed. One reason I sold my Centrica shares was because I see political risks to sustained demand for gas as a source of energy in the UK.

Choosing great companies

Not only that, but I think for someone looking ahead to retirement it is not enough simply to zoom in on defensive industries. One then also needs to choose great companies in those industries in which to invest.

Think about it like buying a house. Just buying a house in a part of town that is always popular does not make it a good investment. One needs to choose the right house, as well as a popular area.

In this regard, I see some things to like about BT as a possible holding for my portfolio. For example, its Openreach subsidiary has a leading position in the digital backbone of the country’s infrastructure. I think that is an incredible asset and could be a big source of profits in future.

But overall I do not see BT as a great company. Last year, for example, revenue fell 2% and post-tax profit tumbled 13%. Its Enterprise and Global divisions saw revenues fall, while the core Consumer business had flat revenues. In fact, the only sizeable division where sales grew was Openreach. Competition is fierce. The company’s legacy pension obligations could keep throwing up large costs.

BT shares and investment strategy

As my own investment choice illustrates, I do not think BT shares have a place in every retirement portfolio. In fact, I do not think that about any shares.

What I buy is based on me finding sectors I think are attractive. But crucially, I then also try to choose what I think look like great companies in those sectors. From my perspective, at least, BT shares do not meet that test. Every investor needs to make their own choices about what suits them. The more I know about a firm, the better able I feel to make such choices.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Christopher Ruane owns shares in Rolls-Royce. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »