Bargain or bust: will the Petrofac share price bounce back?

The Petrofac (PFC) share price has fallen by 30% over the last year. Roland Head looks at the risks and potential rewards of this special situation.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Stack of British pound coins falling on list of share prices

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

The Petrofac (LSE: PFC) share price has fallen by more than 30% over the last year. Shares in the energy services provider are now worth 90% less than they were 10 years ago.

Petrofac’s problems are well known — the company has been under investigation by the UK’s Serious Fraud Office since 2017 and is struggling to rebuild its order book. However, Petrofac has new management and the SFO investigation must end at some point. I’ve been looking at the shares as a potential special situation buy.

A tough time for Petrofac

I’ll start with a word of warning. I see this as quite a high-risk situation. In my view, Petrofac’s share price could still have further to fall.

Once concern is that Petrofac’s revenue has fallen by nearly 50% since 2016. Although some of the company’s rivals have also seen their revenues fall over this period, Petrofac faces additional difficulties due to the SFO investigation.

This criminal probe has damaged the company’s reputation and appears to be limiting its ability to win new work. In March, Petrofac was barred from bidding on new contracts for UAE state oil company ADNOC — one of its oldest clients.

Petrofac also missed out on contract wins in Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 2019. I think this was probably linked to the SFO investigation too.

If Petrofac is eventually charged by the SFO, the company could end up facing a significant fine.

Right now, there’s no way to know what the final damage might be. In my view, that’s the main risk facing shareholders.

High risk, high reward?

Markets hate uncertainty. I think this is one reason for Petrofac’s weak share price performance. I think we could see a strong recovery if the SFO investigation concludes without the company being charged.

The business is now being run by a new chief executive, Sami Iskander, who has a history of senior roles with major western oil and gas companies. He’s committed to maintaining high standards of ethics and compliance, while extending the firm’s operations into the fast-growing renewable energy sector.

If Iskander’s strategy is successful, I think Petrofac’s performance could improve rapidly over the next two or three years. In my view, this is a classic high-risk, high-reward situation.

Petrofac share price: what I’d do

Broker forecasts suggest Petrofac will return to profit this year and deliver steady growth in 2022 and 2023. The latest consensus forecasts show earnings of 15.1 cents per share for 2021, doubling to 30 cents per share by 2023.

If the company can deliver on these forecasts, then I think there’s a good chance Petrofac’s share price could double over the next few years. But at this stage, I think there’s still a high degree of uncertainty about this.

Petrofac shares look reasonably priced to me, on around 13 times 2021 forecast earnings. But I’m not sure this provides me with enough margin of safety if things go wrong.

Petrofac’s rival Wood Group is priced on a similar valuation without the risk of the SFO investigation. I don’t like betting on uncertain situations when I buy stocks, so for me, Wood Group might be a better buy today than Petrofac.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland Head has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »