I’d forget the Barclays share price! The bad news keeps coming for FTSE 100 banks

Thinking of adding Barclays to your investment portfolio? Royston Wild explains why he thinks the FTSE 100 banking giant should be avoided at all costs.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

It shouldn’t be a shock that the FTSE 100’s banks have reversed again more recently. The broader blue-chip index has clung onto the gains it generated during late March’s rally. Financial giants like Barclays (LSE: BARC) haven’t fared quite so well. And with good reason.

I’ve recently touched on why Lloyds finds itself in dire straits today. The prospect of the UK economy sinking at the fastest rate for hundreds of years in 2020 — not my words but the words of key Bank of England officials — naturally throws a shadow over the banking sector.

On Thursday, Standard & Poor’s downgraded its outlooks on a cluster of these financial giants following the coronavirus breakout too. The ratings agency cut its view on Footsie firms Barclays, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland from ‘stable’ to ‘negative’.

Screen of price moves in the FTSE 100

Fresh fears for the FTSE 100 banks

Explaining the rationale behind its decision, S&P commented: “Even under our base case of an economic recovery starting in third-quarter 2020, we expect bank earnings, asset quality, and in some cases, capitalization, to weaken meaningfully through end-2020 and into 2021.”

The ratings experts added that there are “significant downside risks” to this base scenario. S&P argues that fresh government policy in response to the Covid-19 crisis may not be totally successful in averting permanent economic damage.

It also says government action provides additional room for the sovereign, for companies, and for individuals to increase their indebtedness. The body goes on to comment that the lifting of quarantine measures are likely to be slow and subject to setbacks, adding that “the longer the delay in the recovery of economic activity, the less sustainable this extra debt will be.”

For the banks then, S&P said the domestic loan loss rate could rise to 100 basis points in 2020. This is around five times the recorded level in each of the past six years. A predicted economic recovery next year would help the rate ease by around 67 basis points, the agency predicts. But this would still be north of the UK long-term average.

Don’t bank on Barclays

That S&P assessment highlights the huge challenges the British banking sector faces in the short term and beyond. It naturally raises more concerns over Barclays and the state of its balance sheet too.

Sure, the FTSE 100 bank may have hurdled most recent Bank of England stress tests. But this was on the understanding that Barclays would axe dividend payments, staff bonuses, and cut corporate debt coupon payments in the event of a UK economic meltdown. Those assessments were also concluded several months before the coronavirus crisis, and the threat of unprecedented economic damage emerged.

Dividends have fallen at Barclays, in line with Prudential Regulation Authority guidance. I worry that this development, even if followed by those other stress test requirements, would prove insufficient in the face of a painful and prolonged coronavirus-related hit to the economy. In my opinion, Footsie colossus Barclays carries far too much risk to be considered a sensible investment.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Royston Wild has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »