Why I think Lindsell Train might finally have shaken off the ‘Woodford curse’

Neil Woodford’s well-documented problems have hit both of these investment trusts. Here’s why I’m thinking of buying them.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Shares in the Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LSE: LTI) have lost almost half their value since last summer. Some put that down to the demise of Neil Woodford’s Woodford Equity Income fund, which collapsed under a liquidity crisis.

Faith in gurus was, perhaps, fatally damaged. And it was the turn of Nick Train, manager of the Lindsell Train trust, next.

Although there surely was a Woodford effect, there was clearly more to it than that. I’d argued for some time that Lindsell Train shares were seriously overvalued. At one stage we were looking at a premium of 90% over net asset value (NAV), and I saw nothing to justify that.

But the shares picked up nearly 10% in morning trading Tuesday, so is the Woodford effect finally history?

NAV update

The spike comes a day after the trust released its February update, though I saw noting exciting in it. The firm reported a premium of 13% at 31 January, a little up on a 12% premium a month previously. And at £1,072.57, NAV was a few pounds down.

The share price has now dropped to £1,078, so we’re looking at no premium at all really. Does that make the Lindsell Train Investment Trust a buy? I think it does, but I’d sell if the premium climbed too high again.

The thing is, I see the trust as relatively easy to replicate. Its biggest holding by far, representing 49%, is in Lindsell Train Limited, which manages the trust, plus a handful of funds. And most of the rest is in quoted stocks. So if you hand over half of your cash for the company to manage in its funds, and spread the other half across the trust’s other holdings, you could match it for NAV without paying any premium. But I do think a modest premium is worth it for the convenience.

Woodford

What of Woodford’s legacy itself? Schroder Investment Management took over his Woodford Patient Capital investment trust, and it’s been known as Schroder UK Public Private Trust (LSE: SUPP) since 16 December.

One of the new management’s early priorities has been to unwind some of the trust’s illiquid and unquoted investments. Woodford gained his reputation managing portfolios of highly liquid stocks with plenty of flexibility. But his downfall came from abandoning that approach and greatly increasing the illiquidity risk in his investments.

Getting the trust back to its earlier strategy and liquidity is no easy task, and the share price has been suffering further. The price briefly ticked up after the transition, but it’s turned down again, and has now fallen 17% since Schroder took over.

Net Asset Value

During that time, NAV is holding up reasonably well. From 54.7p on 16 December, it’s down just a little to 52.91p, at the time of writing. That puts the shares, priced at 30.3p, on a discount to NAV of 43%. And I really don’t think the Schroder UK Public Private Trust deserves to be so lowly valued now.

I’m still seeing the Woodford curse hovering menacingly over this trust, but it won’t be there forever. And while it is, I’m seriously considering buying. Both of these investment trusts are now on my shortlist.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »