If you’d invested £1,000 in Rio Tinto 10 years ago, this is what your shares would be worth now

Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) had its ups and downs over the last decade, but investors would have still come out on top.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

It would have cost about £983 to buy 31 shares of Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) in early December 2009. If dividends, when received, were reinvested in additional shares when possible or set aside for later when not, the position would have been worth £2,125 measured at last week’s closing price of 4,320.5p per share.

The number of shares held would have increased from 31 to 49 through reinvestment of dividends over the 10 years. The total return on the investment would have been 8% on average each year. 

Investing in an ETF that tracks the total return of the FTSE 100 could have earned a return of 7.53% annually (before fees were deducted) on average over 10 years.

The return for Rio does, of course, exclude the effects of transaction fees, and allows for buying shares only on dividend payment dates. However, it appears Rio just about outperformed the FTSE 100 over the last decade.

Digging deeper

The news is even better over five and three years. A £1,000, or thereabouts, investment in Rio five years ago, would have been worth £2,196.9 when measured at last week’s close. The total return of 17.22% on average over the years would have beaten the comparable 5.93% you could have made tracking the FTSE 100.

Buying £1,000 worth of shares in Rio and reinvesting the dividends over the last three years would have returned 18.98% on average each year. The investment would have been worth around £1,656 at the end of last week. The FTSE 100 tracker had an average annual total return of 7.04% over a comparable period.

Copper bottomed

Rio is a cyclical stock. When global growth wanes or surges, commodity prices tend to behave similarly, and Rio’s profits get dragged in the same direction. The reason behind the five and three-year performance being impressive is they reflected the effects of a commodity price surge.

Rio made a loss in 2015 as commodity prices slumped, but profits have returned as prices turned upwards. Iron ore moved sharply upward in price from under $40 per tonne in 2015, to a high of $120 in mid-2019, and now changes hands for over $80. It costs Rio about $20 to produce a tonne of iron ore, and it ships hundreds of millions of tonnes.

Rio produces hundreds of thousands of tonnes of copper already and has major projects that currently promise to add tens of thousands more. The price of this metal has also increased. With the proliferation of uses for it in wind farms, solar panels, and electric vehicles, demand for copper should remain robust.

Although global commodity prices could slump again, Rio does have a strong balance sheet, capable of seeing it safely through a global slowdown. Earnings cover regular dividend payments at least two times over, offering a nice margin of safety for income investors.

The loss Rio made in 2015 was small in comparison to those made by Anglo American and BHP Group around that tricky period, which bodes well for the future. Thermal coal could become a stranded asset, and Rio does not have exposure to it, while Anglo and BHP do.

If I were looking for a FTSE 100 industrial mining stock to own right now, for the long term in a diversified portfolio, I would pick Rio Tinto.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

James J. McCombie owns shares in Anglo American. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »