Why I’m still avoiding this former Neil Woodford-approved growth stock

The latest set of results from this one-time market darling aren’t exactly encouraging. This former holder is steering clear.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Shares in estate agent Purplebricks (LSE: PURP) were up one minute and down the next this morning following the release of the company’s latest set of interim results, suggesting investors weren’t exactly sure what to think of the ‘progress’ made since April.

Once you wade through the waffle, however, it seems clear to me that this is one company that should still be avoided like the plague — and not simply because it was once a core holding for fallen fund manager Neil Woodford. 

Stable…for now

Revenue was very slightly up to £64.8m on a pro forma basis over the six months to Halloween, with almost three-quarters of this amount coming from the UK (and the remainder from the company’s operations in Canada).

This, however, couldn’t save the former market darling from swinging to an operating loss of £1.2m for the period. Once the impact of closing its businesses in Australia and the US are taken into account, a loss of £14.1m was recorded. 

As one might expect, attempts were made to accentuate the positive. Fairly meaningless numbers, such as the fact that Purplebricks had saved its customers over £150m in commission over the period, were highlighted. Relatively new CEO Vic Darvey also stated that management was “very pleased with the progress made” given the generally skittish housing market, adding that “diverse revenue streams” and 12% year-on-year growth in the average amount of money it is making per instruction had helped smooth things out.  

Remarking that the business is now “stabilised” is one thing, but I think the suggestion that Purplebricks is “enjoying profitable trading” is stretching things somewhat.

Cautionary tale

Today’s market reaction might not raise any eyebrows, but it’s worth reminding ourselves just how poor an investment the company has been lately. 

At the beginning of the year, Purplebricks’ shares were trading at 147p a pop. Go back to August 2017 and the very same stock was around 485p. As I type, the price is 104p.

Could this have all been foreseen? I think so.  

Purplebricks is a cautionary tale of what happens when companies try to grow too quickly. As mentioned quite a while ago, it’s risky expanding into new markets when you’re still attempting to verify the business model back home.

Indeed, this desire for growth at any cost is coming back to haunt the business and beginning to impact its balance sheet. At £41.6m, Purplebricks’ cash position at the end of October was 34% less than where it stood just six months earlier (£62.8m).

Not that management seems rattled, stating that it “remains confident” of hitting its medium-term target of holding a 10% share of the UK market. Personally, I’m struggling to see a catalyst for another purple patch that will be sufficient to raise it from the 4.1% share it held at the end of October. The company’s TV ads may have grabbed attention, but so too has the fact that it charges a fee to sellers even if it’s unable to shift their property. That might be a risk worth taking when the market is buoyant, but it becomes a significantly less attractive proposition in a Brexit-obsessed, recession-fearing UK.  

All told, today’s numbers haven’t changed my view on Purplebricks. I’d leave it to the traders and focus instead on finding quality businesses that can be held for decades.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Paul Summers has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »