I love investing and count myself lucky to be paid to opine about it.
But like most writers I also like to spread my wings.
Â
So you can imagine how excited I was when I got the General Election slot for the Collective.
Â
At last â a platform for my political analysis!
Â
Stand aside Laura Kuenssberg! Take five Andrew Marr! Thousands would read my snap verdict on why Johnson had triumphed, or how Corbyn had pipped him to the post.
Â
Maybe I could even do fancy graphs and a swing-o-meterâŠ
Casting vote
âŠzzzzrrrrrp!
Â
Not so fast, said my editor in a hurry.
Â
Firstly, The Motley Fool is about investing not party politics. Take your punditry to Twitter â that was the message.
Â
Secondly there’d be no chance for post-vote analysis anyway, because our schedule meant my article would be written in advance, and long before the result was known.
Â
“Maybe you could do something about P/E ratios or dividends? Or where Sainsbury’s goes next in the battle of the grocers?”
Â
Well maybe, but I’m not so easily deterred.
Â
You see we need to talk about politics, even if we don’t talk about politics.
Â
That’s because you’ll be reading lots about the election result and what it means for your portfolio in the days ahead.
Â
Analysts will encourage you to buy or sell. Some will urge you to get defensive, even as others say it’s time to back up the truck and buy.
Â
And that will be true whoever wins!
Â
At best, most of it will be unfounded speculation. At worst misleading.
Â
Investing is never so predictable, and nobody ever knows for sure.
Â
Doubtful? Consider the huge US equity rally in the wake of the election of President Trump â a victory that was universally expected to end the bull market.
Â
The truth is starting valuations and long-term earnings growth is most important to stock market investors, not who gets a few years to run the country.
Beware party poopers
Hence, I’m undaunted by both my lack of a crystal ball and my editor’s instructions.
Â
I may not be able to wax lyrical on who won the election or why â but I can confidently tell you the result should not derail your investing plans.
Â
I’m not that old and yet I’ve seen parties of many persuasions hold the keys to Downing Street. Stocks have risen and fallen regardless.
Â
The economy matters, but not quite as much as you’d think. Most listed companies trade globally. Also, strong companies tend to get stronger, even through recessions.
Â
Regulation matters, but even this is complicated. It can help incumbents â who tend to be bigger, and are often investable â and hinder new competition â the would-be startups that might otherwise disrupt and compete with your holdings.
Â
There are similar countervailing factors with everything from corporate tax rates to interventions by government.
Â
Some win, some lose. Life goes on.
Â
At the least you’ll need to look at the likely impact on specific firms, rather than generalising wildly.
Revolutionary agenda
Am I too sanguine? What if a new Labour government started nationalising industries? Wouldn’t this be a disaster for investors?
Â
I grant you it’s not exactly red meat for the old animal spirits, and it’s not something I’d personally be recommending to Number Ten.
Â
But I’m not even sure nationalisation would spell certain disaster for investors.
Â
The kinds of companies likely to be nationalised have often been mediocre performers for years. Investors might decide we’re well rid of them.
Â
I also think it’s unlikely a government would steal them at a below-market rate. There are laws, but even more there are the pension funds that hold such firms. Shafting pensioners has never been a good look for a party that wants to remain in power.
Â
Granted you can forget a fat premium when the government comes calling for your utility, transport, or infrastructure-related shares. But I doubt you’ll be truly robbed.
Â
To be clear: I do agree there is a limit to what a government can do before it starts to derail capitalism.
Â
But I also strongly suspect there’s some low-hanging fruit to be plucked without troubling the markets too much.
Â
By the same token, a Conservative win wouldn’t necessarily be great for investors â even though its agenda looks the more business-friendly.
Â
The Tories would be elected with a mandate to get Brexit done â even if that means a no-deal Brexit.
Â
And whatever the pros and cons of Brexit long-term, the markets have already shown us that crashing out of the EU without a deal won’t be welcomed.
Investors of the world, unite!
Finally, remember UK shares have spent years languishing under the shadow of both the EU Referendum result and unrelenting political uncertainty.
Â
It’s quite possible that most if not all the bad news could be priced inâŠ
Â
âŠand then again it’s possible it’s not.
Â
As I said, nobody really knows!
Â
I’d sound cleverer making a bold prediction that you’d forget by next week if I was wrong, but I’d rather sound dumb and be right.
Â
What history tells us is that good companies deliver strong returns over the long-term that should dwarf any returns from hiding your wealth in cash. Even average shares â easily owned via a UK stock market tracker â have smashed cash long-term.
Â
Over the past 50 years UK shares have delivered an after-inflation return of around 5.5%. That compares to less than 2% for cash.
Â
Think of all the political drama that has happened over those five decades â yet investors who kept the faith have prospered.
Â
Nowadays all investors should also have a decent chunk of their portfolio invested in overseas markets â whether through index funds, active funds, or their own stock picks.
Â
And overseas markets don’t care which party wins the UK General Election. Even Brexit at this point probably isn’t hugely consequential to most countries around the world.
Â
The bottom line is to keep on keeping on. Save and invest a healthy slug of your wealth, and get as much as you can into ISAs and pensions where political parties of all colours are less likely to meddle with it.
Â
We’re lucky to live in a democracy, and we should vote for different parties as we see fit.
Â
But good investing advice is the same for everyone.