Was Neil Woodford the only weight on the Purplebricks share price?

The Woodford funds have sold off over 10% of total Purplebricks equity these past few months.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Purplebricks (LSE:PURP) has been intimately entwined with Neil Woodford’s recent investment management career. This means that the end of that career in its recent form has significant implications for the company share price. The question is, well, what?

One way of reading it is that as the clouds clear under the new fund management then the Purplebricks price will recover. There is, after all, something of an overhang there, and there have been substantial sales. The other is that there’s something else to worry about and I’m in that second camp.

The company was backed by Woodford’s funds early on, and it was one of the major paydays when it listed then soared. So far so good, a justification of the investment style. There’s nothing wrong, after all, with the idea of invading a business as staid as estate agency. Maybe not having to pay for high street shops, combined with a flat fee upfront rather than commission system, will work? But then the cracks started to appear.

The first was concern over revenue recognition. So, if an upfront fee is paid then when does that actually become income that profits can be calculated from? It’s not when the cheque is received, for there’s still much work to be done. We also shouldn’t insist that the sale must have gone through before recognition as, after all, it’s not a ‘no sale, no pay’ fee. Worries about this produced the first setback for the Purplebricks share price.

Then there was the foreign expansion that blew up. And then this summer and autumn, we’ve seen the Woodford effect in reverse. The problem was having too much in illiquid stocks to pay off redemptions – always a possible problem in an open-ended fund. That meant having to sell down, aggressively, stakes in more liquid holdings – Purplebricks being one of those. From June to September the stake went from 29% to 17.64%. That’s a lot of selling and it would, in the absence of anything else, have dropped the share price.

Which brings forward our question – is it just that selling depressing it? And now that the funds are under new management, no longer gasping for liquidity, will there thus be a bounce?

There could be, but I doubt it. For I’m worried about those two more basic things. Firstly, the essential idea itself. Companies work better when incentives are aligned. Payment by results is the way to motivate salesmen and thus a percentage fee on a sale seems to me the right way to be running an estate agency. I think this will become more obvious during the next housing price downturn.

Secondly, that revenue recognition thing. Because of the past movements in that, what is booked as a profit and when, we don’t really know whether the model even works today.

There could be a Purplebricks share price bounce as the Woodford fund selling pressure lifts. But I’m willing to bet that there won’t be for more fundamental and underlying reasons. Steer clear.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Neither Tim nor The Motley Fool UK have a position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »