Are BP shares the FTSE 100’s best high yield investment right now?

There are come cracking dividend yields to be had from the FTSE 100 (INDEXFTSE: UKX) right now, but could BP plc (LON: BP) be among the very best?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

If you’re after the best high-yield investments in the FTSE 100, what criteria are you looking for?

I might suggest a current big yield, good long-term cover by earnings, a progressive dividend policy, and a commitment from the company to keep making its annual payments even during short-term downturns. But can you get all of those anywhere?

I reckon you can, and that the past few years have proven BP (LSE: BP) to satisfy all those requirements with aplomb. Let’s look at the current state of affairs…

BP shares are currently forecast to pay 30p per share in dividends this year. On today’s share price of 565p, that’s a 5.3% yield. That’s significantly above the FTSE 100 average, which currently stands at around 4.4%, and clearly satisfies the first of my suggested requirements. 

Crisis over?

What about cover by earnings? With forecast earnings per share expected to come in at around 39.5p, we’re looking at forward cover of around 1.3 times this year. Whether that’s good enough depends on the business itself and its long-term trends — and if that’s the way cover was likely to remain, I’d be a bit sceptical of it and I’d want to see something a bit stronger.

But that brings me on to my fourth point, and that’s the company’s long-term commitment. BP has been through a horrendous decade, starting with the Deepwater Horizon disaster — but while the dividend had to be slashed to help pay for the clean-up costs, it was reinstated surprisingly quickly and has been maintained.

Since then we’ve seen the price of a barrel of oil plunge to a low of under $30, a level that would be crippling to many of the world’s producers had it continued over the long term. But that’s the very reason why it couldn’t be sustained at such paltry levels, and I think that was obvious right from the start of the oil crisis — and two years ago I was predicting stabilisation at or better than $70 per barrel or so.

BP chief executive Bob Dudley predicted low oil for a few years, but the company steadfastly stuck to its policy of paying its dividend — seeing its annual payment as something that should reflect the long-term value of the company rather than the vagaries of short-term sentiment.

Steady dividend

And so the dividend was maintained at 40 cents per share right through the oil price depression — and if you’d bought at the 2016 lows of around 325p, you could have locked-in effective long-term yields of around 9%. You could retire rich on that.

To me, that unequivocally demonstrates that BP has an eye to the long-term rewarding of its shareholders, and is focused on providing returns that are not dependent on short-term shocks. 

How about progressive returns? I was assured by the words of chief financial officer Brian Gilvary at FY results time for 2017. He said: “Our organic cash flows are back in balance and our financial frame remains resilient… Our share buyback programme in the fourth quarter offset the dilution from scrip dividends issued in September and our intent remains to offset any ongoing scrip dilution through further buybacks over time.

That sounds like a focus on growing shareholder returns. One of the FTSE 100’s very best long-term dividend winners? I think so.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »