Retirement saving: 3 funds that are smashing Neil Woodford’s Equity Income fund

Neil Woodford’s performance in recent years has been poor. Here’s a look at three funds outperforming him.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Neil Woodford’s Equity Income fund currently holds assets of around £7bn. That’s a sizeable amount of money, suggesting that many Brits have trusted the well-known portfolio manager with their retirement savings.

Yet in recent years, Woodford’s performance has been underwhelming, to say the least. According to figures from Hargreaves Lansdown, over the last year, Woodford’s fund has returned -11.3%. Over three years, it has returned just 0.9%.

Are other portfolio managers generating better returns for investors? Absolutely. Here’s a look at three that are outperforming Neil Woodford’s Equity Income fund by a wide margin.

Fundsmith Equity

First up, Fundsmith Equity fund, which is managed by another well-known portfolio manager, Terry Smith. This is a popular option among UK investors and looking at its performance figures, it’s not hard to see why. Over one and three years, it has returned 11.6% and 76.3% respectively. Over five years, it has returned almost 140%. That’s an excellent return.

Unlike Woodford’s fund, which mainly invests in UK stocks, Fundsmith Equity is a global operation. For example, top holdings include Paypal and Microsoft, which are both listed in the US. Smith takes a long-term approach to investing and looks for ‘resilient’ businesses whose advantages are difficult to replicate. The fund is significantly more concentrated than Woodford’s, in that it only holds around 30 stocks, whereas Woodford’s holds around 125.

Ongoing charges for this one are a little higher than the fees on Woodford’s fund (0.97% vs 0.6% through Hargreaves Lansdown), but for the performance generated, that seems to be a small price to pay. For those looking to diversify internationally, this fund could be a good choice, in my view.

Old Mutual UK Mid Cap

Another pick that has generated robust returns over the last few years is the Old Mutual UK Mid Cap fund. Over one and three years, it has returned 11.7% and 53.8% respectively.

As its name suggests, it focuses on the mid-cap area of the market, investing around 80% of its capital in FTSE 250 stocks. Top holdings currently include Boohoo.com, Fevertree Drinks and Ashtead Group, so you can see there’s a strong focus on growth.

As I noted last week, mid-cap shares can often produce higher returns than large-cap shares over the long term, therefore, this area of the market is definitely worth considering if you’re aiming for higher returns. For those looking for FTSE 250 exposure, this fund could be an excellent choice. Fees are reasonable at 0.78% per year.

Marlborough Nano-Cap Growth

Lastly, take a look at the Marlborough Nano-Cap Growth fund. Over one and three years, it has generated super returns of 20.4% and 71% respectively.

Managed by expert stock picker Giles Hargreave, it invests in some of the smallest companies listed in the UK, with a particular focus on companies with market capitalisations under £100m. This means that it’s most likely not going to be suitable for risk-averse investors, as smaller companies can be significantly more volatile than larger one. However, for those interested in small-cap exposure, it could certainly be worth a look. Fees are just 0.66% per year. 

Of course, these are just three funds that have performed well in recent years. There are many others. It can pay to be diversified when investing in funds, in order to ensure that you’re not too exposed to one particular fund manager, should they underperform.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Edward Sheldon owns shares in Boohoo.com. Teresa Kersten is an employee of LinkedIn and is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended PayPal Holdings. The Motley Fool UK has recommended boohoo.com. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »