2 turnaround stocks, and a 5% yielder, I’d buy today

Investing in these bombed-out shares is risky but could be profitable, and there’s a tempting 5% dividend too.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Serco Group (LSE: SRP) shareholders have had a tough time, with their shares down 80% over five years, after profit warnings and a weak set of results for 2016. And 2017 results are expected to bring in a big drop in EPS too, though the signs of a successful turnaround look like they’re starting to show through.

Full-year results are due on 22 February, and according to December’s update they should be better than previously expected. Profit should be towards the top end of guidance, with net debt towards the lower end. The firm expects to report an order intake of more than £3bn, and the key thing for me is that “strong profit growth” is on the cards for 2018 and 2019.

The move back to growth got an extra boost Wednesday, as the firm updated us on its planned acquisition of a portfolio of health facilities management contracts from failed Carillion.

Cheaper acquisition

The deal has been revised, and should all of the planned contracts be transferred to Serco, the total payable would amount to £29.7m. That’s cheaper than the £47.7m initially envisaged in December, and covers “substantially all of the assets” originally targeted.

The lower consideration is due to “Serco’s re-evaluation of potential liabilities, indemnities, warranties and the additional working capital investment required as a result of Carillion’s liquidation.” But expected revenues are unchanged — estimated at around £90m annually.

The mooted 2017 earnings fall puts the shares on a P/E of over 30 at today’s price of 84p, but two years of forecast growth would drop that to under 19 by 2019. That’s still a bit heady, but I can see the start of a solid recovery — and a decent long-term buy.

Depressed favourite

AA (LSE: AA) shares have lost over 70% of their value since a peak of more than 430p in March 2015. We’re looking at just 115p today, giving us a very low P/E of just 5.5 based on expectations for the year ended January 2017 — and that would drop as low as 4.8 on 2019 forecasts.

Earnings are expected to turn upwards this year, and there are well-covered dividends yielding better than 5% on the cards. And last week’s pre-close update looked promising.

The big problem for AA is the debt that it has been saddled with since flotation in 2014. The company did refinance some of it in July 2017, but at the halfway stage it stood at almost £2.7bn.

That was slightly down on the £2.8bn level a year previously, but I don’t see any signs of a serious reduction. To put it into perspective, the market capitalisation of the company stands at just £700m — and debt of £2.7bn is almost eight times the company’s expected EBITDA for the current year.

New cash?

That’s massive debt by any standards, and the big question is whether it’s sustainable without turning to a new equity issue to raise more cash. I have my doubts, and I really do think some sort of cash injection will be needed.

Despite these problems, Neil Woodford holds AA as an income stock. And though there is clearly risk here, I don’t see a great danger to the thrice-covered dividend (the cost of which is tiny compared to the debt, so suspending it wouldn’t help).

At super-low P/E levels, I see too much fear built into the price, and I’d be tempted.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »