Why I’d ditch this struggling turnaround stock to buy this growth champion

This struggling pubco has nothing on its market-beating peer.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Photo: Oast House Archive. Cropped. Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Mitchells & Butlers (LSE: MAB) is one of the UK’s largest pub and managed restaurant companies but the company is struggling to grow and I would ditch this floundering firm as soon as possible. 

According to a trading update issued today, after a strong summer, Mitchells is now facing more challenging trading “particularly given poor weather this year up against a sunny period last year which has specifically impacted drink sales.” Even though the company reports that sales on a like-for-like basis are up 2.9% year-to-date, ahead of the wider market, “margins for the full year will be below last year due to inflationary cost pressures.” 

According to City analysts, the pub operator’s earnings per share are expected to decline by 1% for the financial year ending 30 September 2017, followed by a similar contraction for the following year. With headwinds building, it’s no surprise that shares in the business currently trade at a forward P/E of only 7, a valuation that reflects the company’s cloudy outlook.

A poor investment 

Mitchells has been struggling to create value for investors for the past five years. Excluding dividends, the shares have returned -13% since September 2013. By comparison, the company’s larger peer, JD Wetherspoon (LSE: JDW) has seen the value of its shares rise by 160% over the past five years as the company has gone from strength to strength. 

Spoons is one of the London market’s greatest success stories. Since floating in 1992, the shares have produced a total return of 4,690%, outperforming its peer group, the FTSE 100, FTSE 250 and FTSE All-Share. 

And as it continues to dominate the UK high street, I believe that the firm will continue to serve up attractive returns for investors. 

Still growing 

As other pubcos such as Mitchells have floundered in recent years, Spoons has continued to expand. Pre-tax profit has increased by 80% over the past six years and the company’s results for the 53 weeks ended 30 July, smashed expectations with the group reporting an adjusted pre-tax profit for the period of £102m, compared to City expectations of £98m. For the full-year, pre-tax profit rose by 25%. 

The fact that it can continue to chalk up double-digit earnings growth, while the rest of the pub industry is struggling, is a testament to the company’s offering and skill of management. Further expansion is planned with 10 to 15 new pubs expected by the year ending July 2018. For fiscal 2017, the company opened 10 pubs but also closed 41 underperforming pubs, which had little impact on revenue. 

Unlike other pubcos, it really is a cash cow. For the year to 30 July, the company generated free cash flow per share of 97p, giving a free cash flow yield of 7.8%. I believe free cash flow yield offers investors a better measure of a company’s fundamental performance than the widely used P/E ratio because cash generation is a more reliable indicator of value creation than earnings, which can be manipulated by management to present the best possible view of the company to investors. This free cash flow yield is highly impressive and significantly above that of even the market’s most defensive operators such as Unilever (3.9%) and Reckitt Benckiser (4.9%). 

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rupert Hargreaves owns no share mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »