Normally, when I see City analysts predicting forward earnings growth of 16% I donât expect to see the forward price-to-earnings ratio of a company to be as low as nine.
However, thatâs what we are seeing with RM (LSE: RM) right now, so is something wrong or is this share a bargain?
In line with expectations
The company provides educational resources, IT services and software to the education sector, and updated the market on progress on 22 March. Trading in the current year is down more than expected, according to the firmâs chairman John Poulter. Schools are being cautious with expenditure due to uncertainty over their funding and because staff costs rose this year, he reckons. One bright spot is that first-quarter trading in RMâs international business âcontinues its positive trend.â
Overall, the directors think full-year trading will come in as expected, which means a flat result on earnings for the year to November 2017 and 16% growth the year after that. Last year, around 20% of revenue came from outside the UK. So even though international trading is going well, I donât think the 80% of trade coming from the UK can be dragging too hard on the firmâs results. Otherwise, City analystsâ forecasts would be bleaker. Meanwhile, the forecast growth in earnings for 2018 suggests the directors expect UK trading to bounce back.
So, a soft patch of trading in the UK this year and a positive outlook beyond that does not explain the low valuation. Even the forward dividend yield looks attractive running at just under 3.8% for 2018, with the anticipated payout covered three times by forward earnings â a high-looking level of cover suggesting the directors see opportunities to reinvest cash inflow for growth from here. Indeed, they expressed their confidence in RMâs future by hiking the final dividend for 2016 by more than 20% compared to the year before.
The elephant in the room?
There must be something wrong, and there is. It seems that the cash the firm generates from operations is all being gobbled up by the pension deficit. However, if thatâs the issue holding the shares back, it could be disguising opportunity for investors.
With the full-year results for 2016, RM said the pension deficit increased âto ÂŁ34.8m (2015: ÂŁ21.9m) as liabilities have been impacted by lower market discount rates.â Of the just over ÂŁ13m of cash from operations RM generated during the year, almost ÂŁ12m went as a cash contribution to the defined benefit pension scheme. Thatâs a 200% increase over the ÂŁ4m or so the firm threw at the pension the year before.
Nevertheless, RM is trading well, generating lots of cash, and ended 2016 with zero debt and a ÂŁ40m cash pile on its balance sheet. The shares seem to be trending up and thereâs no sign that the directors are scaling back their organic and acquisitive growth ambitions. RM could be well worth your further research. I think the low valuation compensates for the pension issue and a valuation re-rating could power investor returns from here as 2017 unfolds, as long as funding holds up in the education market.