The future may not be so bleak for Imagination Technologies Group plc after all

Imagination Technologies Group plc (LON: IMG) might have some cards up its sleeve.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Shares in Imagination Technologies (LSE: IMG) lost more than half of their value yesterday after the company revealed that its primary customer, Apple has decided to bring some of its microchip production in-house and is therefore no longer going to require Imagination’s services.

Imagination and Apple’s relationship goes back years, and the former has become dependent on the latter for more than half of its total revenues. This year, it’s expected Apple will pay nearly £65m in royalties to Imagination. In 15 to 24 months time, this figure will fall to zero.

However, even though it now appears Imagination will struggle to survive after the break-up, this is not a simple case.

Indeed, some City analysts believe Imagination has a strong case to take Apple to court as, while the tech giant may have a multi-billion dollar research and development budget, building graphics processing units from scratch (similar to those provided by Imagination) will be challenging unless the company has acquired intellectual property rights or mastered reverse engineering.

With this being the case, according to the Financial Times, the Apple/Imagination relationship may still have some life in it yet. Imagination holds a significant number of patents around low-power graphics processors and may have the bargaining power to discuss new commercial terms with Apple for the use of this intellectual property without a costly legal battle. 

Legal battle 

Despite its size, if it comes to a full intellectual property lawsuit, Apple seems to be on the back foot. iPhones have been built using Imagination’s chips for a decade now, and as the company has so far failed to provide evidence showing how the technology it plans to use going forward differs from that provided by Imagination, its intentions certainly look suspicious.

Still, even though Imagination may have the upper hand if it comes to a legal battle, there’s no denying that the company’s outlook has now changed significantly for good. A legal battle is likely to cost a lot of money and time, two commodities it lacks. When the Apple revenues completely vanish, the firm will return to a lossmaking position, and the company’s debt is already growing. It rose from £35m to £45m in 2016. 

If Imagination’s management has no appetite for a costly, lengthy legal battle the company’s future looks bleak. But if management can negotiate an out-of-court settlement to continue the relationship on a smaller scale, the group may be able to buy itself some time to cut costs and move into other markets.

The bottom line 

Overall after yesterday’s news, Imagination’s outlook has changed drastically, there’s just no other way of putting it. If the group takes Apple to court over intellectual property rights, it may be awarded a substantial reimbursement, but such an outcome is almost impossible to predict and would not happen fast.

Unfortunately, without more information on how management intends to tackle Apple and rebase the Imagination business to profit without its large US partner, it is not possible to place a value on the shares.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended Apple. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of Imagination Technologies and has the following options: long January 2018 $90 calls on Apple and short January 2018 $95 calls on Apple. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »