Is this mid-cap stock a better buy than its FTSE 100 banking client?

This FTSE 250 firm is an impressive business. But is it better value than a top FTSE 100 (INDEXFTSE: UKX) bank?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Trading, investment and information solutions company Fidessa (LSE: FDSA) today announced its results for 2016, reporting a 12% rise in revenue and a 25% increase in pre-tax profit.

Could this FTSE 250 firm, which services 85% of the world’s premier financial institutions (from investment banks to niche hedge funds), be a better investment than one of its prominent FTSE 100 banking clients?

Solid results

Fidessa’s revenue, earnings and dividend were comfortably ahead of City expectations but the shares are only modestly higher in early trading. The headline numbers received a huge boost from weakened sterling since the Brexit vote. For example, while it reported pre-tax profit up 25%, the rise at constant exchange rates was just 1%.

Nevertheless, these were solid results. Fidessa ended the year with £95m cash on the balance sheet (up from £78m the previous year) and no debt. The board lifted the final dividend and regular special dividend by 11%.

Financial regulation continues to be a long-term driver for Fidessa’s growth as customers focus on efficiency, transparency, compliance and performance. In the shorter term, the company noted that customers have been faced with uncertainty around how the Brexit vote and the US election results might affect their business.

A premium worth paying

Fidessa’s shares recovered quickly from the financial crisis and from their 2009 year-end price have more than doubled to a current 2,450p, giving a market cap of £945m. However, only about a third of this increase reflects earnings growth, with the majority coming from the market simply valuing the company’s earnings more highly. The price-to-earnings (P/E) has therefore risen from 16.8 to 26.2.

Today’s P/E is obviously relatively high but Fidessa’s strong balance sheet, international diversification, 87% recurring revenue and a 3.8% dividend yield merit a premium rating, in my view. The stock may have been cheaper in the past but I continue to see this as a good long-term investment today.

A £7.5m vote of confidence

Shares of Barclays (LSE: BARC) had recovered from the financial crisis to over 350p by late 2009. However, in contrast to Fidessa’s, they’ve made no progress since. In fact, Barclays’ shares have been below 300p for the best part of the last four years.

Legacy issues have continued to dog the company but I still think there’s a good underlying business here and long-term value to be delivered for investors. Chief executive Jes Staley, who took the helm in December 2015, is obviously of the same mind, because he bought £6.5m of shares at 233p before even getting his foot through the boardroom door. When the shares fell to 170p, he splashed out another £1m.

Re-rating potential

At the time of Mr Staley’s first buy, Barclays was trading at a near-20% discount to net tangible asset value, a level from which I thought investors could reap substantial long-term rewards. At the time of his second buy, the discount was 40%, which I thought was terrific value.

Today, the shares are at 230p, back to a near-20% discount to net tangible asset value, so I still see substantial long-term rewards for investors from here. Barclays’ P/E for the current year is a modest 11.8, falling to 10 for 2018, as strong earnings growth is expected to kick in.

As such, while I think Fidessa is a solid investment, I believe Barclays could be set for the kind of re-rating in the coming years that Fidessa has enjoyed in the past.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

G A Chester has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays and Fidessa. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »