Should you make room for Pets At Home Group plc after today’s update?

The market may not like today’s update but Paul Summers thinks Pets At Home Group plc (LON:PETS) is a sound defensive play.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

I must say that I’m rather bemused by the market’s response to the latest update from retailer Pets At Home (LSE: PETS), with shares in the mid-cap sinking over 8% in early trading. Let’s take a look at why this happened and question whether it offers an opportunity for prospective investors.

Overreaction?

Today’s Q3 results from the Wilmslow-based business (taking into account trading between 14 October and 5 January) really aren’t that bad and — in my opinion — certainly don’t warrant such a reaction. Although sales from the Merchandise business were flat (at ÂŁ177.4m), group revenue still rose 4.4% (0.1% on a like-for-like basis) to ÂŁ203.7m. Much of this can be attributed to the excellent growth in service revenue. This rocketed 47.8% (7% on a like-for-like basis) to ÂŁ26.3m over the reporting period, thanks to a 26.2% rise (to ÂŁ9.5m) in fee income from the company’s vet services as well as a contribution from specialist referral centres. 

In addition to emphasising that these services were a “platform for continuing strong growth“, CEO Ian Kellett also reflected on the encouraging performance of the company’s online offering during the period and a positive reaction to its Christmas range. Importantly, the company stressed that its FY17 profit outlook “remains in line with market expectations“.

All this leads to me think that shares in Pets At Home have been oversold this morning. After all, if you’re looking for defensive companies likely to continue bringing in the cash regardless of how the UK exits the EU or Donald Trump behaves, look no further than those operating in this fast-growing, cash-generative market.

While shares in Pets At Home are unlikely to rocket any time soon — they started 2017 at a very similar price to where they were in January 2016 — I think the company’s plans to continue opening new superstores, vet practices and grooming salons makes sense. Assuming it can sustain the positive momentum achieved in its service and online divisions, a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 15 feels about right. Should the shares fall further, Pets At Home could start to look like a bargain from a long-term perspective. 

Growth star

If you don’t mind paying a bit more, I think Dechra Pharmaceuticals (LSE: DPH), the provider of veterinary products, is another share worthy of further investigation. In a hugely positive period for holders, shares in the Northwich-based company have shot up 45% since this time last year. Although some of this year’s estimated 176% EPS growth will already be priced-in, demand for the company’s products will surely only get stronger given the UK’s love of furry companions, meaning that there could be further upside ahead. As many investors come to realise, just because a share has risen strongly isn’t to say that it can’t continue doing so.

Any drawbacks? Well, it won’t come as a surprise to learn that shares in Dechra don’t come cheap. With price-to-earnings ratios of 25 for 2017 and 21 for 2018, the stock is unlikely to appeal to those dedicated to finding value on the stock market. Although the company can boast many years of strong dividend growth — often an indicator of a company in rude health — the 1.4% yield for 2017 is also relatively small and won’t be of interest to those keen on generating income from their investments. By comparison, shares in Pets At Home come with a far-more-satisfying 3.4% yield, easily covered by earnings.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Paul Summers has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »