3 stocks I reckon could crash in 2017

Here are three shares that Alan Oscroft thinks are overvalued at the end of 2016.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

I love to end the year thinking about shares that should do well next year. But they won’t all prosper and we should also consider those that might have a tough year ahead of them — whether we already hold them or are perhaps thinking of buying them.

Supermarket carnage

My first candidate for an overpriced share going into 2017 is Tesco (LSE: TSCO). If you didn’t see Tesco’s problems coming, you’re in good company, as neither did Warren Buffett — though I’d love to be wrong only as often as he’s been over my investing career.

Tesco has recognised its problems, has got in a new boss, and has worked hard on a strategy of adjusting to the new austerity-driven changes to the UK’s shopping environment. But many who hark back to the trustworthy old days just assume that Tesco will get itself back ahead of the pack in terms of earnings growth and dividends.

Yet how many have been thinking the same about Marks & Spencer over the past 20 years, while that old high street stalwart has consistently failed to regain its position in the hearts and minds (and wallets) of the great British public?

Tesco shares are on a P/E of 27 for the year to February, dropping to 21 for 2018, with no dividends to speak of. To me, that’s too expensive for a supermarket and I see a poor year ahead.

Fads and fashions

I’m going against a lot of growth investors when I say I think ASOS (LSE: ASC) is overvalued.

The online fashion retailer has achieved impressive market penetration, but forecast earnings per share for the year to August 2017 are still way below 2012’s figure, and the shares are on a forward P/E of 62. (Will you please stop slicing those onions, it’s making me cry — oh, you’re not.)

EPS is going to have to multiply fourfold to bring that figure back close to the FTSE’s long-term average P/E, and every year that slips by is another in which the competition can pile into what’s essentially a low-barrier business.

Sure, growth shares often command sky-high valuations, and ASOS shares keep booming — but they keep busting too. I know many will disagree, and I do concede that ASOS is in a growing market and has an early-mover advantage. But at today’s share prices, I see a disappointing 2017 coming.

Not joined up

I’ll tell you what I don’t see when I look at Vodafone Group (LSE: VOD). A joined-up international company with any obvious long-term global plan. What I see, instead, is a number of operations in different countries around the world that just happen to be owned by the same overall company.

And I see Vodafone just going with the flow, without any sort of overall grand strategy. Sure, maybe that’s the way a commodities firm should be, and it’s undeniable that telecommunication is becoming more and more of an indistinguishable commodity every year with no real differentiation between products and services.

But Vodafone isn’t on a commodity stock valuation. We’re looking at P/E multiples of about 30, while the firm pays out in dividends around twice its earnings. That looks like takeover pricing to me, and the longer we go without one the more I see the potential for a share price fall.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended ASOS. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »