Could these retail stocks be destroyed by Christmas?

G A Chester casts an eye over the retail sector for potential Christmas casualties.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rarely does a year pass without a retail Christmas casualty. There’s the dreaded early January profit warning and plunge in the shares. And then the dilemma for investors over whether the bad news represents a temporary setback for the company or the start of something worse.

Tesco shocked the market with its first profit warning in 20 years on 12 January 2012. Almost five years on, the company’s shares are still languishing at about half the price they were trading at before that fateful day.

Which retailers could have chilling Christmas news for investors this year?

Three-time turkey

In its previous stock market incarnation, video games specialist Game Digital (LSE: GMD) had a bad Christmas 2011. As a result, debt covenants were in danger of being breached, key suppliers pulled the plug due to concerns over the company’s creditworthiness and before the end of March it was in administration.

Game was salvaged by private equity and refloated on the stock market at 200p in June 2014. The shares did well initially but then came Christmas. A profit warning on 14 January 2015 saw the shares crash 30% from 348p to 242p. Last Christmas, the company didn’t even get through to January. The profit warning arrived on 23 December and the shares plummeted 38% from 206p to 128p.

Will Game manage to dodge the curse of Christmas this year? Looking on the optimistic side, the earnings forecast for the company’s financial year to July 2017 is a lowly 4.9p, compared with 8.9p it posted last year and 18.7p the year before. So, it would really have to plumb the depths to warn on profits this year. Having said that, while noting an encouraging line-up of new games and console releases “over our peak period and the next 12 months,” Game’s board “retains a cautious outlook” due to “the prevailing trading conditions.”

Given the outlook and Game’s Christmas trading record, a current share price of 60p and a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 12.2 don’t look all that appealing to me. Still, at least the company has a much stronger balance sheet (net cash of £38.5m) than many on the high street: for example, Debenhams has net debt of £279m.

Christmas clobber?

Fashion chain Next (LSE: NXT) doesn’t have the routinely dismal Christmas record of Game, which made its poor showing last Christmas all the more disconcerting. A 5 January trading update saw the shares fall 5% to 6,860p, although they’d already been in decline from a high of over 8,000p in early December.

Unusually warm weather in November and December was only partly to blame for lower than expected full-price sales. There was a potentially more serious issue for Next’s longer term prospects in management’s suggestion that “the online competitive environment is getting tougher as industry-wide service propositions catch up with the Next Directory.”

Could the glory days be over? It’s difficult to know, but certainly the company is finding trading conditions tougher than some smaller fashion players, such as Ted Baker, and online-only upstarts, such as Boohoo.

At a share price of 5,100p, Next is on an attractive forward P/E of 11.6. But prudent investors may want to wait for the January update, and perhaps the full-year results, for clues as to whether the company is merely going through a sticky patch or whether its longer-term prospects have fundamentally changed.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

G A Chester has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended boohoo.com and Ted Baker plc. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »