Why have shares in Redcentric plc crashed by two-thirds today?

Shares of growth star Redcentric plc (LON: RCN) have wiped out three years’ worth of gains in just a few hours.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

There are small accounting issues and then there are big ones. Today’s surprise announcement from IT services provider Redcentric (LSE: RCN) falls firmly under the latter heading, which is why shares fell by more than 60% in early trading.

The company shocked the market this morning by disclosing that a routine re-examination of the books prior to releasing interim results had “discovered mis-stated accounting balances in the group’s balance sheet.” Management went on to say “correcting these cumulative historic accounting mis-statements would result in a need to reduce net assets by at least ÂŁ10m.” This is a major setback for a company that recorded ÂŁ90.8m of net assets on the balance sheet at the end of the latest reporting period.

How deep do these problems stretch? Evidently the problems reach back over several years and were bad enough that the CFO was sacked on Sunday. Furthermore, management also revealed that writedowns to previous profits are likely and that net debt was materially higher than reported to the market.

The one figure included in the announcement was that management “believes net debt at the half year was approximately ÂŁ30m.” This should worry investors for two reasons. One, net debt at the end of the latest fiscal year ending March 31 was initially reported as ÂŁ25.3m. So, if it was reduced to ÂŁ30m by the end of September then management isn’t exaggerating by saying the true figure was “materially” higher than reported.

The second cause for concern is the use of the word ‘believe’, as it illustrates the fact that the company is in the midst of its forensic accounting review and further problems could be announced. Of course, the situation could be also be better than expected and the company did attempt to reassure the market by saying it believes the problems were confined to previous years and that current sales are continuing nicely.

What to do?

What should all of this mean for investors? Well, it’s true that the mere mention of an accounting scandal can oftentimes lead the market to overreact and send shares plummeting for little reason. However, in this case the fact that management doesn’t yet know how much debt it has or how much it will have to restate past profits indicates to me that a wait-and-see approach is best for those on the outside looking in.

This means bargain hunters probably shouldn’t begin a position just yet, even though the company has solid growth prospects and shares are now trading at five times (reported) earnings. That said, contrarian investors may want to reassess this position once interim results and revised past reports are revealed. That’s because providing back end IT services such as cloud storage for mid-market firms is a large growth market with hefty margins and significant recurring revenue. And, even if Redcentric’s net debt is around ÂŁ30m, it shouldn’t be an unmanageable amount for the highly cash generative company to handle. But, without knowing exactly what the company’s books look like it’s impossible to accurately judge its value. For that reason I would wait for the dust to settle before taking a closer look. 

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Ian Pierce has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »