Can this small-cap healthcare stock continue to beat big-cap rivals?

Roland Head looks at the latest results from a fast-growing healthcare business with strong overseas growth potential.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Investing in small caps has delivered big results for many investors over the last year. Fast-growing smaller firms have lived up to their reputation for outperforming big-cap stocks, but will this situation continue as valuations rise?

Shareholders of infection control specialist Tristel (LSE: TSTL) have seen the value of their shares rise by almost 40% to 159p over the last 12 months. But today’s full-year results from Tristel appear to have left the market unimpressed, despite a 12% rise in revenue. In this article I’ll explain why this might be.

I’ll also contrast Tristel with a larger manufacturer of healthcare products, joint replacement specialist Smith & Nephew (LSE: SN).

Expenses issues

Sales of Tristel’s infection control products rose by an impressive 12% to £17.1m during the year ending 30 June. Adjusted pre-tax profit rose by 27% to £3.3m, while adjusted earnings rose by 20% to 6.62p per share.

The group’s total dividend — including a 3p per share special payout — rose by 11% to 6.33p per share. Tristel ended the year with net cash of £5.7m, up from £4m at the end of last year.

However, in my view these impressive adjusted figures are clouded by the exclusion of the expenses relating to a £1m stock option bonanza enjoyed by management earlier this year.

This share-based payout is one of the main reasons why Tristel’s weighted average share count rose from 40.7m to 41.9m last year. The dilutive effect of these new shares pushed Tristel’s reported earnings down by 8% to 5.01p per share. This equates to a trailing P/E of 32.

Is Tristel too expensive?

Tristel looks expensive based on historic earnings. However, broker forecasts suggest that adjusted earnings will rise by 15% to 6.8p per share this year, putting the stock on a forecast P/E of 23.

Stock option costs should fall this year, so adjusted earnings will hopefully be closer to the group’s reported numbers. A planned move into the US market in 2018 could give Tristel access to new markets worth up to £18m, according to management estimates.

Although Tristel shares aren’t obviously cheap, I believe they could still deliver further gains. I’d hold for now.

A hip replacement stock?

Shares in joint replacement group Smith & Nephew have risen by 113% during the last five years. But the group’s growth appears to have slowed. Smith & Nephew shares are flat so far this year and don’t look especially cheap, on a 2016 forecast P/E of 18.1. The forecast dividend yield is just 2%, which isn’t very tempting either.

Things could be about to improve, however. Earnings per share are expected to rise by 12% next year, bringing the forecast P/E down to 16. There’s also the potential for a takeover bid. The combination of the weaker pound and Smith & Nephew’s stagnant share price means that for a US buyer, this company would be cheaper than it was at the start of 2016.

It’s worth remembering that despite a £10bn market cap, Smith & Nephew is only a medium-sized player in this sector. A bid could make sense.

Overall, I’d argue that as with Tristel, Smith & Nephew looks fully priced at the moment but has decent medium-term potential.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland Head has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »