Are these 7% yields too good to be true?

Harvey Jones says these two stocks offer fantastic income streams but questions whether they’re sustainable.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

As the returns on cash dwindle into nothingness, the income stream produced by some top FTSE 100 stocks looks more enticing than ever. A select few now yield more than 7% a year, over 700 times the return on NatWest’s notorious cash ISA, which pays just 0.01%.

But a high yield is also a classic danger sign, as it often follows a sharply falling share price. Dividends aren’t guaranteed, and if the company doesn’t generate the cash to cover it, they can be culled overnight. So are these two 7% yields too good to be true?

Royal Dutch Shell

Anglo-Dutch oil giant Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB) now yields 7.6%, the third highest on the FTSE 100, and now makes up £1 in every £7.50 paid out. Last year, it handed investors a whopping £9.37bn, although that was lower than the £10.72bn paid out in 2009 .

Famously, Shell hasn’t cut its dividend since the Second World War, but unless the oil price shows a meaningful recovery, that proud record will have to be sacrificed. Dividend cover is now a wafer thin 0.2, suggesting that future payouts will have to be funded from debt. The BG acquisition has already forced gearing up to 28.1%, more than double 12.7% one year ago. However, management continues to hold the line, maintaining the interim dividend steady at 47 cents at the end of July, despite a 72% drop in Q2 underlying earnings to $1bn. It recently reported earnings-per-share (EPS) of just $0.29, and that gap needs to be bridged somehow.

Shell has been cutting costs alongside every other oil major but this won’t be enough to fund the dividend on its own unless the oil price meaningfully recovers. Talk of an OPEC price freeze and slip in US inventories sparked a mini-recovery last week, but now crude has slipped to around $46 again. Shell generated just $4.8bn free cash from operating activities in Q2, while the dividend cost the group $4.5bn, with annual forecast capex of around $14.5bn. These sums look precarious and another year of low oil prices may finally sink the dividend.

Berkeley Group Holdings

Along with its fellow UK housebuilders, Berkeley Group Holdings (LSE: BGK) suffered a big hit after Brexit. It traded at 3,285p just before the vote and despite recovering from the post-referendum crash it remains 20% below that at 2,606p. This has helped drive the yield to a super-sized 7.4%.

The recent share price collapse is starting to like a great buying opportunity, with the group anticipating £2bn of pre-tax profit to 30 April 2018, based on solid forward sales. The dividend also looks relatively secure, with Berkeley looking to pay out £10 per share evenly over the next five years. EPS are forecast to rise 44% in the year to April 2017, with revenues rising strongly to £2.68bn.

Also, the housing market generally has held firm after Brexit, with surveys repeatedly showing only a slight dip in prices and transaction numbers, which can easily be blamed on the seasonal summer lull.

These are early days and we will have a clearer view when the Government triggers Article 50, possibly next spring. But trading at 9.55 times earnings and yielding such a juicy income stream, and with housing demand strong in an undersupplied market, the future remains bright.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Harvey Jones has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Berkeley Group Holdings and Royal Dutch Shell B. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »