Why Brexit has doomed your pension

Brexit has sent shockwaves through the financial world and could have doomed some workers’ pensions.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Brexit will have a substantial impact on the lives of people across the UK, and one area where its effects are already being felt is in the pensions industry. Since 24 June, financial markets have been in risk-off mode. Investors have dumped equities and risky assets in favour of assets that are perceived to have less risk such as government bonds and gold.

This sudden rush towards government securities has pushed down yields, (as bond prices rise, yields fall) which is great news for borrowers but bad news for bond investors who are now getting a lower return on their investment.

More for less

The single largest buyers of government bonds (excluding central banks via QE) are pension funds. The high quality and long-term nature of government bonds makes them the perfect assets for pension funds that have to match today’s inflows from contributors to future liabilities or pension outflows.

With yields falling this task of matching inflows with future outflows is becoming harder and harder. Most pension funds target a return of 5% to 10% a year on their assets. With most government bonds now yielding less than 2%, it’s easy to see the scale of the problem facing the industry.

Defined benefit funds are the most at risk. According to research from Bank of America at the end of April, the average funded ratio of the top 100 US corporate defined benefit pension plans sat at 77%, and this figure was calculated before the post-Brexit yield slump. The funding ratio of 77% indicates that the $3trn pension universe surveyed is running a $500bn funding gap.

Unsustainable deficit 

Here in the UK, it’s estimated that 11m people are reliant on defined benefit pension schemes and after recent market movements it’s estimated that UK pension deficits hit a record £935bn this week.

There’s no doubt that this is a colossal sum and meeting these liabilities is going to cause a serious headache for the worst-offending companies.

For example, BT’s pension deficit has increased by more than 50% in 18 months (to the end of May). Analysts at investment bank Macquarie believe the deficit now stands at £10.6bn. To put this figure into some perspective in the year to 31 March 2016, BT reported a pre-tax profit of £2.6bn. Macquarie believes that considering the present deficit, BT will have to pay £1bn per annum through to 2030 to fill the pension black hole.

The big question now being asked is, will companies ever be out to meet these pension liabilities?

Unfortunately, there’s now a very real chance that many businesses won’t be able to meet these obligations as deficits at some companies eclipse profits. Meanwhile, the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, a government-sponsored lifeboat for collapsed pension schemes, only has a funding surplus of £4.8bn, that’s just 0.51% of the total value of pension deficits as reported last week.

The figures really speak for themselves. The UK’s pension deficit is only getting worse, and there seems to be no way out.

Protect yourself 

The best way to protect yourself from the upcoming pensions bombshell could be to look after your own pension by investing in shares. And the best way to invest for the highest return is to look to high-quality blue chips with international operations, sustainable dividends and records of achieving the best returns for investors. Companies such as Unilever, AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline all meet these criteria, but there are many more. 

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended GlaxoSmithKline and Unilever. The Motley Fool UK has recommended AstraZeneca. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »