Which Bank Is Best: Barclays PLC, Banco Santander SA Or Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc?

Royston Wild runs the rule over banking behemoths Barclays PLC (LON: BARC), Banco Santander SA (LON: BNC) and Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc (LON: RBS).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Today I am looking at the investment potential of financial goliaths Barclays (LSE: BARC) Santander (LSE: BNC) and Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS).

Dipping developing markets

I have previously been über-bullish about the earnings prospects of Santander thanks to its terrific exposure to emerging markets. The business generates 36% of total profits from South America — half of which come from regional heavyweight Brazil — while its Polish division also gives it exposure to lucrative Eastern Europe.

But while I believe a backcloth of rising wealth and population levels should power Santander in the coming years, current turbulence in these markets could significantly undermine the bank’s performance in the near-term. Collapsing commodity demand is significantly hampering economic growth in these regions, while inflation is also running riot — data this week showed Brazilian price rises hit 12-year peaks in January.

Flying the flag

Barclays also has significant exposure to emerging regions through its retail and investment banking divisions, not to mention its Barclaycard arm. Still, the company’s greater dependence on the comparatively robust UK economy give it a stronger base upon which to deliver earnings growth, in my opinion.

Conversely, RBS does not have any significant exposure to foreign climes, thanks to extensive streamlining following the government bail-out back in 2008. But such has been the aggressive scale of divestments that I think RBS is likely to struggle to generate meaningful revenues growth.

As such, the City expects RBS to endure a 4% earnings slide in 2016, although this still results in a very-attractive P/E rating of 10.6 times. Santander, meanwhile, is expected to see the bottom-line edge just 1% higher, resulting in a smashing earnings multiple of 7.9 times.

But Barclays blows both firms out of the water with an expected 14% earnings bounce this year, resulting in a P/E ratio of just 7 times.

Dividend delights?

Naturally the issue of PPI-related costs remains a bugbear for all three firms. Royal Bank of Scotland recently stashed away another £500m to cover claims, Santander put aside £450m, and Barclays is expected to have hiked provisions again when it reports next week.

On paper, RBS arguably has the stronger balance sheet to absorb further shocks ahead of 2018’s proposed claims ‘deadline’. Last month RBS said it expects its CET1 ratio to register at 15% as of December, blasting Barclays’ ratio of 11.1% — albeit as of the third quarter — and Santander’s ratio of just 10.05% at the close of 2015.

However, RBS’s healthier finances are unlikely to assuage dividend hunters thanks to its insipid earnings outlook, in my opinion. This view is shared by the City, with a projected payout of 1.8p per share for 2016 yielding just 0.7%. And the resurrection of the bank’s dividend policy is yet to be signed off by regulators, of course.

Meanwhile, an anticipated dividend of 19.2 euro cents per share at Santander blows RBS out of the water with a 5.5% yield. But the prospect of fresh revenues weakness in far-flung markets, combined with its wafer-thin balance sheet, could put paid to such predictions.

As a consequence, I reckon Barclays’ projected 7.4p per share dividend for 2016 — yielding a chunky 4.6% — is the best bet for income-hungry investors, its superior earnings profile likely to give payouts plenty of fuel looking ahead.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Royston Wild has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »