Still Missing: A Buy Signal For BHP Billiton plc, Rio Tinto plc And Anglo American plc

Why the contrarian-minded should continue to avoid BHP Billiton plc (LON: BLT), Rio Tinto plc (LON: RIO) and Anglo American plc (LON: AAL).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

A year ago, many were attracted to the big mining firms because of high dividend yields and low forward price-to- earnings ratios.

BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT), Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) and Anglo American (LSE: AAL) looked attractive on traditional valuation measures. However, I was bearish on the firms and explained why in an article published on 12 January 2015.

Today, with the shares of those firms much lower than they were a year ago, I’m still bearish and think it’s too soon to revisit the sector. The crucial ‘buy’ signal is missing today, just as it was a year ago.

What signal?

The thrust of my article last year was that it’s better to think of the miners as cyclical firms through-and-through. What their businesses produce has low differentiation and little added value. As such, the commodity companies have almost no pricing power.

The problem with cyclical firms for investors is that valuation indicators tend to present upside down. The big miners can look the most attractive on valuation grounds just at the point when they’re the most dangerous – just before the next profit and share price collapse, as we’ve seen lately. It’s therefore risky to justify an investment through the lens of traditional value or income measures.

Instead, it makes sense to me to wait for the signal of momentum before buying. At the very least, I want to see flatlining charts for the big miners’ share prices and for the underlying commodities that they produce. Ideally, the charts will be turning up, providing evidence that the bottom of the fall in prices might already have occurred.

Beware false signals

I would argue now that a return to the big miners is an investment decision that has no urgency. I’m not expecting the miners to snap back up fast, so I’ll look for evidence of a turn in the commodity markets over months, perhaps even years, rather than weeks. I was wrong, for example, to wonder whether it was time to buy the miners in a second article published on 4 February 2015. That was a false signal, although I did urge caution even in that article. Fortunately, despite wondering whether the time was right, I didn’t buy any miners’ shares in February last year.

When I look at the share price charts today of miners such as BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Anglo American, and at the price charts for commodities such as iron ore, oil and copper, I still see a downtrend over a one-year period. To me, that means the crucial ‘buy’ signal for the mining companies is still missing, just as it was a year ago. When it comes to investing in the big mining companies, I think it seems likely that the best strategy from here is one of slothfulness.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »