Woodford Was Right About Tesco plc, But Is He Right About Rolls-Royce Holding plc?

Dave Sullivan explores Neil Woodford’s decision to sell Rolls-Royce Holding plc (LON: RR). Does it bear the same hallmarks as his decision to sell Tesco plc (LON: TSCO) in 2012?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

In April 2012, Neil Woodford, then fund manager of two of the UK’s biggest income funds revealed that he had finally sold the last of his shares in Tesco (LSE: TSCO)

Writing in the Telegraph, he explained his rationale: “I have held Tesco shares in my funds for most of the past 20 years, during which time it has proved to be a very successful long term investment, but I now find myself worrying more than ever about the risks – both macro-economic and business specific risks – that this investment now entails”.

The star manager, who now runs the Woodford Equity Income Fund and the Woodford Patient Capital Trust, still believed that Tesco was a cheap asset and a great British business. But he was presented with other, more compelling and less risky investment opportunities elsewhere.

History repeating?

As can be seen from the five-year chart below, Woodford made the correct call by selling his fund’s Tesco shares and I think history could well be repeating itself with Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR) currently.

From hitting an apparent peak in 2014, the shares have been on a steady downward trend since Rolls-Royce first warned on profits. The falls have intensified since the company announced the results of its strategic review on fears that a recovery would take longer than most investors had expected, coupled with a potential dividend cut.

In his blog post of 9 December 2015 Woodford echoed these fears, stating that the company has become more challenged over the last couple of years, which has weighed significantly on its share price.

He felt some of these problems simply represented growing pains, as the business transitioned between civil aerospace engine designs and made investments in new capacity to deliver its substantial forward order book. But he also noted that it had suffered from the deteriorating global economic environment, especially in its marine business that has been negatively impacted by the slump in oil industry exploration activity.

Final straw

It would appear that the final straw was the “very disappointing” November trading update that has resulted in the shares being cut across all of the investment guru’s mandates.

Woodford believed the problems currently being experienced across the military aerospace and marine business had now spread to the civil aerospace side of the business. This has resulted in material downgrades to both profits and cash expectations, leading the investor to believe that the 2016 dividend will be cut. These events have shaken his confidence in the business, which he has held for the last 10 years through his current mandates and previously at Invesco Perpetual.

Indeed, analysts have been trimming their EPS figures all year: the broker average EPS figure for 2015 earnings (taken from the 24 brokers that covered the stock) has fallen from 62.45p in December 2014 to 52.26p currently, according to Stockopedia data. Personally, I think this will fall further going into 2016 as the strategic review begins to work through the business.

On the sidelines

In summarising, Woodford clearly states that if his caution is misguided he’ll revisit the investment. But for now the proceeds of the sale have been put into shares that meet his 3-5-year high single-digit annualised return expectation.

While some investors may see this as an opportunity to top up their holding in a top quality UK business, I’m with Mr Woodford on this occasion – and will be joining him on the sidelines awaiting the green shoots of a recovery.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Dave Sullivan has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »