How Lloyds Banking Group plc Could Fall To 54p

Why I’m avoiding shares in Lloyds Banking Group plc (LON: LLOY)

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

The government’s decisions to offload its holdings in Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) and Royal Bank of Scotland Group were good ones — the outlook for shareholders in both firms looks precarious to me.

Is Lloyds one of the worst dividend choices on the market?

Dividend investing strikes me as a sensible strategy likely to deliver dependable returns over decades, but only if I select shares carefully.

How tempting Lloyds seems as its price-to-earnings (P/E) rating falls and its dividend yield rises even as the earnings’ outlook appears to be rosy. How can I go wrong if I move in to tap that fat payout?

Things may not be as they seem. I don’t think it’s ever right to think of cyclical firms such as Lloyds as buy-and-forget investments. Right now, Lloyds Banking Group looks something like a seductive Venus flytrap for unwary investors who buzz around the sweet-smelling high yields in the stock market garden.

Tempting as Lloyds might be, the biggest share-price gains in the current macro-cycle seem behind us and the downside risk looks enormous. The Venus flytrap is beginning to twitch and I think the government saw it coming.

The big moves up could be behind us

At today’s 73p, Lloyds’ shares are just about where they were at the end of 2013 and were more or less flat the whole time in between. Over the same two-year period, earnings grew from £415 million to around £8,117 million, and increase of 1856%. So why did the share price remain where it was during that earnings’ recovery?

That looks like the forward-looking nature of the stock market in action. The big rises in Lloyds’ shares happened during 2012 and 2013 — when the market anticipated the firm’s recovery in profits. Now it seems the shares could be anticipating another down-leg.

The big London-listed banks profits, dividend payments, and share prices wiggle up and down, often by an alarming degree, in accordance with the boom and bust economics that we have to live with.

54p might be close

Investors as a whole figured out the cyclical nature of banks long ago and the stock market tends to mark down banks’ valuations as a macro-cycle matures. I think that’s happening with Lloyds right now. So the P/E rating faces down pressure as earnings continue to rise because investors fear the next cyclical plunge. If the P/E rating falls, the dividend yield will go up.

I remember how attractive the banks looked just before last decade’s credit-crunch. When dividend yields rose to match the falling P/E rating many labelled the banks ‘square’ shares, and they seemed super-attractive good value. Buying then was disastrous because the banks shares plunged — the stock market tries to iron-out cyclicality but fails.

The credit crunch might have been an extreme event but economic cycles are common. Lloyds’ valuation looks as if it could be heading towards ‘square’ territory again to me, and that’s a major warning sign. Given the firm’s forecast earnings for 2016, the shares would need to be at 54p for the dividend yield to match the P/E rating. It doesn’t take a big mental leap to imagine ‘square’ happening, if not during 2016, at least at some point down the line.

The regulatory environment remains tough for banks in Britain, competition is fierce, and Lloyds’ earnings have already done their bouncing back. With valuation-compression dragging on investor total returns from here and the ever-present threat of a cyclical downturn, Lloyds Banking Group looks like a risky investment proposition to me.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »