Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited, Polymetal International PLC And Cape PLC: Value Traps Or Screaming Buys?

Are these 3 resources stocks cheap for a reason? Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited (LON: GKP), Polymetal International PLC (LON: POLY) and Cape PLC (LON: CIU)

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

With the resources sector having been a sea of red in recent months, the valuations of a number of oil and mining companies have come under severe pressure. In fact, falls of over 50% of share prices are not uncommon in the last year, with investor sentiment declining rapidly as the prices of various commodities have fallen.

Certainly, value investors may be very interested in low valuations, but the challenge lies in assessing which companies are unjustly cheap and which ones are cheap for good reason. In other words, are resources companies such as Gulf Keystone Petroleum (LSE: GKP), Polymetal (LSE: POLY) and Cape (LSE: CIU) value traps or screaming buys?

Cape

With Cape’s shares having fallen by 16% in the last year, its decline is relatively modest compared to some of its sector peers. That’s at least partly because the industrial services provider has been able to maintain growing profitability in the last two years, with 2015’s forecast of an 11% fall in earnings being rather mild versus its sector peers. And, with Cape being expected to deliver a decline in net profit of just 1% next year, it appears to be coping rather well during a period of cutbacks for the energy sector.

As a result, Cape’s price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.8 indicates that it offers excellent value for money. Furthermore, a yield of 6% which is covered 1.9 times by profit is not only high but reasonably sustainable. So, while Cape’s share price could realistically fall further in the coming months, for investors looking years ahead it appears to be an excellent buy.

Polymetal

Similarly, precious metals company Polymetal seems to be in a stronger position as a business than its 4% share price fall since the turn of the year suggests. Certainly, the outlook for the price of gold, silver and copper is rather downbeat, but Polymetal’s earnings are due to fall by just 5% this year before rising by 3% next year.

Clearly, neither of these figures is likely to positively catalyse investor sentiment in the company, but a rising gold price could do so. The world economy continues to offer a rather uncertain outlook and, with interest rates set to begin their rise within the next six months, the contraction of global monetary policy may cause a flight to a store of wealth in the form of gold. Therefore, with Polymetal having a P/E ratio of 12.4, its shares appear to be worth buying for the long term.

Gulf Keystone Petroleum

Gulf Keystone Petroleum also offers a wide margin of safety. Its shares trade on a price to book value (P/B) ratio of only 1.2 which, for a company with such an appealing asset base, appears to be very low. The problem, though, is that Gulf Keystone Petroleum may require an even wider margin of safety to make it a strong buy at the present time.

That’s because its finances continue to be in a rather precarious position. Certainly, the receipt of $13m a couple of weeks ago from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) is a positive step which has led Gulf Keystone Petroleum to begin exporting its oil rather than selling it at a lower price on the domestic market. However, there is still little information on whether its debtors will be cleared, as well as uncertainty regarding regular payments. As such, a lower P/B ratio may be needed before investment in case of a placing being required over the medium term.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Peter Stephens has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »