Which Retailer’s Results Make It A Top Buy? Dixons Carphone PLC vs Sports Direct International Plc

Roland Head takes a closer look at full-year results from Dixons Carphone PLC (LON:DC) and Sports Direct International Plc (LON:SPD).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

There’s little doubt in my mind that Dixons Carphone (LSE: DC) and Sports Direct International (LSE: SPD) are two of the UK’s top retail stocks. Today’s full-year results from both firms seem to confirm that view.

Dixons Carphone reported a 21% increase in pro-forma adjusted pre-tax profits, which rose to £381m. Sports Direct matched this with a 20.5% increase in underlying pre-tax profits.

Interestingly, both firms have their critics. Sports Direct founder Mike Ashley’s abrasive and unconventional style clashes with more conventional City suits, while the combination of Carphone Warehouse and Dixons was seen as a poor fit by many.

So far, both firms’ detractors have been proved wrong. Shares in Sports Direct have risen by a staggering 546% over the last five years, during which post-tax profits have risen by 185%.

Dixon Carphone’s share price has dialled up a 36% gain since the merger completed last year.

Such strong performance does come at a price, however. Based on today’s results, Dixons shares trade on a P/E of 18.1, while Sports Direct trades on a P/E of 18.7.

In contrast, the FTSE 100 trades on an average of 14.6. With this in mind, is either company a buy after today’s results?

Dixons Carphone

Dixons reported a 6% rise in like-for-like revenue over the last year, highlighting the fact that much of the improvement in profits came from cost-savings as a result of combining the two businesses and from disposing of loss-making operations.

This helped to provide a worthwhile increase in operating margin, which increased from 4.4% to 4.8% on an adjusted basis.

Shareholders were rewarded with a 42% hike in the total dividend, which rose to 8.5p. That’s significantly more than the 7.8p forecast by analysts, but still only gives a yield of 1.8% at today’s share price. This is considerably less than the FTSE 100 average of 3.6%.

With this in mind, investors in Dixons Carphone need to focus on growth prospects.

Analysts’ forecasts suggest that both earnings per share and the dividend should rise by 17% 9p in 2015/16, giving a forecast P/E of 16.6 and a prospective yield of 2.0%.

Sports Direct

In my view, Sports Direct’s results were slightly more impressive than those of Dixons Carphone, although the firm did surprise investors by lowering its profit target for the year ahead to reflect a lack of acquisitions last year.

Although group sales only rose by 4.7%, the firm’s gross profit margin rise from 42.7% to 43.8%, while the operating margin rose from 9.2% to 10.4%.

In my view, Sports Direct’s ability to generate such strong margins while maintaining very competitive in-store prices is one of the company’s key advantages.

Analysts are forecasting a 16% rise in earnings per share for Sports Direct next year, but as always, there’s no dividend. This is my biggest complaint about Sports Direct. Although the firm has proved itself to be good at allocating capital effectively, I think it’s now a large enough business to justify paying a dividend.

Today’s top retail buy?

I believe that both of these firms could still offer decent returns for growth investors.

Of the two, I’d be tempted to choose Sports Direct, thanks to its high profit margins and strong free cash flow, but it’s a close-run decision.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland Head has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Sports Direct International. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »