Should You Buy Neil Woodford Rejects HSBC Holdings plc, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc And Smith & Nephew plc?

Or are HSBC Holdings plc (LON:HSBA), Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc (LON:RB) and Smith & Nephew plc (LON:SN) still shares to sell?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Renowned fund manager Neil Woodford sold his holdings in HSBC (LSE: HSBA) (NYSE: HSBC.US), Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) and Smith & Nephew (LSE: SN) (NYSE: SNN.US) within the past year.

Could these stocks be good buys today? Or are they still shares to sell?

HSBC

Having shunned banks since 2002, Woodford began buying HSBC in May 2013 when he was still at Invesco Perpetual. A year later, after leaving Invesco, he included HSBC in the portfolio of his new CF Woodford Equity Income Fund.

Woodford described HSBC as “a very different beast” to the UK’s other banks, being a “conservatively-managed, well-capitalised business with a good spread of international assets”. And he found the valuation attractive: “trading at around or even below its book value and its yield is also appealing”.

However, three months after the launch of his new fund, Woodford ditched his HSBC holding, saying that he was becoming concerned that fines “are increasingly being sized on a bank’s ability to pay, rather than on the extent of the transgression”. He felt that “fine inflation” was an unquantifiable risk that could potentially hamper HSBC’s ability to grow its dividend.

Today, while HSBC continues to trade at around book value with a juicy 5.4% yield, the risk of fine inflation has not gone away. Indeed, since Woodford sold, new issues and further potential penalties have emerged. So, it would seem that the bank is an even less appealing investment proposition now.

Reckitt Benckiser

Consumer goods group Reckitt Benckiser is a stock Woodford had held in his portfolios for more than a decade, the attraction being “a great business with a very strong management team and an excellent product line-up”.

In September last year, Woodford’s team told us: Such a high quality business deserves a high market rating but the shares have recently become too expensive to continue to justify their position in the portfolio”.

During the month in which Woodford sold, Reckitt’s average share price was £52 and the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 19.6. Today, the shares are trading at around £58.50 and the P/E is 22.1. It would appear that Reckitt has become an even stronger “sell” at the current valuation.

Smith & Nephew

Medical devices firm Smith & Nephew is another holding Woodford disposed of purely on valuation grounds. The shares soared on bid speculation last December, and reached a peak of around £12 in January when Woodford sold. The P/E, based on forecast earnings for the December year end, was 21 and the dividend yield was 1.7%.

Woodford’s team said: “Clearly, if a bid were to materialise, it could lift the share price higher still but we believe other opportunities now offer greater long-term income potential”.

Smith & Nephew’s shares are trading only a little lower today than at their January peak, and the forward P/E and yield are about the same. So, again, it would appear that at the current valuation this is a stock Woodford would be happy to sell in order to redeploy cash in more promising opportunities.

If Woodford is right, potential investors in these three companies should wait for improved clarity on external issues (in the case of HSBC) and a lower valuation entry point (in the case of Reckitt and Smith & Nephew).

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

G A Chester has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended HSBC Holdings. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »