Which Is Riskier: Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited Or Falkland Oil and Gas Limited?

Does Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited (LON: GKP) face bigger hurdles than Falkland Oil and Gas Limited (LON: FOGL)?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Oil explorers come with risk, that’s a given. But sometimes the risk can be atypical, as we’ve seen with Gulf Keystone Petroleum (LSE: GKP)(NASDAQOTH: GFKSY.US). Gulf has found the oil, in very nice quantities, and it has the infrastructure in place to get it out and shipped — but it’s having trouble getting paid by the government of the Kurdistan region of Iraq.

Falklands Oil and Gas (LSE: FOGL), on the other hand, is still looking for the oil. But at least its not under the yoke of a temperamental government — assuming that Argentina’s latest outburst is just hot air.

Neither company is profitable yet, but which is the riskier?

Exploration risk

The risk for Falklands Oil and Gas is really pretty traditional, in that it’s still in the net investment and exploratory phase. The company is the largest of six operating around the Falkland Islands, and has embarked on a new drilling programme of six wells targeting more than 1.3 billion barrels of the stuff.

The risk, as always, is that it will run out of cash before it makes sufficient discoveries, but right now that doesn’t look too worrying — the company’s 2015 operations are well funded, and at 31 December it had around $100m of cash and no debt.

Oh, and the Argentinian legal threats are indeed groundless, as the UN has long ago ruled that it has no legal jurisdiction.

Gulf Keystone, on the other hand, looks like it should be a sure-fire winner — at least on the face of it. In 2014 it produced approximately 6.5 million barrels, and there’s a big increase expected for 2015. In fact, in December it hit its milestone of 40,000 barrels of oil per day. And it’s selling the stuff — except for actually getting paid for it.

Where’s the cash?

With revenue of $38.6m in 2014, the company recorded a loss after tax of $248m — a good part of that being due to the $100m it’s owed for exports but has so far been unable to actually get its hands on. Gulf is having to sell a lot of oil domestically for lower prices, and it has received a $26m pre-payment, so that’s promising.

But the debt is building up, with $240m raised in debt securities and associated warrants a year ago, though the firm only had cash of $85m at its disposal by April this year. Gulf is striving to get a regular export payment cycle established, and that’s going to be crucial to its survival — though the Kurdistan government is hardly the most stable and business-focused in the world.

Chairman Andrew Simon said that “2014 was a pivotal year for Gulf Keystone as we completed the critical transition from explorer to producer“, and 2015 needs to be pivotal in getting paid for what it sells.

So which is it?

Oil exploration is too risky for me, but if I had to choose I’d go for exploration risk of Falklands Oil and Gas rather than the political risk faced by Gulf Keystone.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »