Should You Buy Rio Tinto plc, Antofagasta plc Or Vedanta Resources plc?

Royston Wild considers whether investors should park their cash in Rio Tinto plc (LON: RIO), Antofagasta plc (LON: ANTO) or Vedanta Resources plc (LON: VED).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Today I am looking at whether natural resources specialists Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) (NYSE: RIO.US), Antofagasta (LSE: ANTO) or Vedanta Resources (LSE: VED) are robust stock candidates.

Rio leads in the value stakes

On a pure earnings basis, none of the mining shares provides show-stopping bang for one’s buck, in my opinion, although Rio Tinto is undoubtedly the ‘best’ priced stock of the three.

Following on from last year’s 9% earnings decline, further weakness across commodity markets is expected to push Rio Tinto’s bottom line 25% lower in 2015, resulting in a P/E rating of 12.9 times predicted earnings. Any reading around or below 15 times is widely regarded as decent value for money.

Copper miner Antofagasta, who’s expecting 2% bottom line improvement this year, culminates in an earnings multiple of 17.1 times. And Vedanta brings up the rear, with an estimated 99% earnings decline for the year concluding March 2015, resulting in a P/E rating of 103.8 times. Expectations of a stunning turnaround in the next fiscal year pushes this to 28.7 times, still an expensive readout, however.

A mixed commodity outlook

Still, it could be argued that Rio Tinto’s huge reliance upon the beleaguered iron ore sector merits its cheap price.

The miner sources around three-quarters of all profits from the commodity, so a cooling Chinese steelmaking industry and rising ore production explains Rio Tinto’s relatively low P/E multiple. Indeed, Morgan Stanley expects iron ore to average around $75 per tonne through to the close of 2018, down from $90 in 2014, owing to abundant supply from Australia and Brazil.

More cheerily, however, the broker expects oil prices to begin to creep up again following the collapse of recent months: good news for Vedanta, which sources around a third of earnings from this one market. An average of $70 per barrel is currently pencilled in for this year, up from around $60 recently, and which is anticipated to rise to $88 in 2016 before reclaiming $100 in 2017.

Morgan Stanley is also bullish on the copper market, no doubt music to the ears of Antofagasta. The red metal is expected to flourish on the back of strong demand from the automobile, white goods and construction sectors, creating an average of around $7,050 per tonne for 2015 compared with $6,880 in 2014. And this is expected to progress to $7,280 next year before marching to $7,600 in 2017.

But fragile global economy casts shadow

Still, I believe that the perilous state of the global economy could see these forecasts blown to smithereens in the coming months. Chinese factory floor activity continues to stutter and the construction sector is on its knees, while key economic data from the eurozone remains uneven at best.

To be fair, the companies I have mentioned have undertaken significant steps to mitigate the effect of falling revenues. From significant capex reductions through to project divestments, all three firms have been busy creating more agile and cost-effective entities should an environment of poor raw material prices persist.

But given the possibility of persistent demand weakness and production ramp-ups across the globe, I believe that all three miners remain at risk of significant — and prolonged — earnings woe.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Royston Wild has no position in any shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »