Is It Game Over For AstraZeneca plc Shareholders?

Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) is not going to make a comeback for AstraZeneca plc (LON:AZN), whose shareholders are in trouble now, argues Alessandro Pasetti.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Pfizer (NYSE: PFE.US) announced yesterday it would buy Hospira for about $15 billion: how bad is that for AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) shareholders? Very — and here’s why.

Downside

Almost everybody in town knew it could end badly for Astra shareholders, but I reckon the full extent of the damage has yet to become apparent. The downside for Astra shareholders is 20% or more from this current level (4,456p), in my view.

Now that Pfizer is officially out of the game — although it may target smaller deals in the region of $70bn — the drop in Astra’s share price could be even more painful because investors may feel entitled to abandon Astra, betting on Shire and GlaxoSmithKline instead. Both Shire and Glaxo boast more promising prospects, and are relatively cheaper than Astra, based on a series of factors, including fundamentals.

On 28 October 2014, soon after Pfizer decided to allocate billions of capital to buy back its own stock, I warned our readers. Ever since, Astra stock has risen 3.2%, which compares with a +6.2% performance for the FTSE 100. During the period Shire has risen 21%, and even Glaxo has done much better, recording a +8.2% performance.

Who should take the blame? Of course, Astra’s chief executive officer, Pascal Soriot, is under pressure to show investors he was right to reject Pfizer’s proposal, which was 25% higher than Astra’s current equity value, and included a large Pfizer stock component.

A mighty task…

October 2014

“I’d also suggest that looming US and Irish rules on tax inversions are playing their part,” a senior analyst told me back in October, when I flagged the risk of holding Astra shares. 

“They (regulators) already scuppered the Abbvie/Shire takeover, and since Pfizer/AstraZeneca was a similar tax-driven move there’s no reason to expect Pfizer to re-enter the bidding, at least not at anywhere near the previous price, since a combination won’t have the same tax breaks that it might have had earlier,” he added then. 

So, big funds have been left holding an overvalued stock that pays a decent dividend. What’s next, then?

Of course, Mr Soriot has the opportunity to turn things around. Don’t ask me how – I have no clue, really. What I know is that Astra has a medium-term plan according to which earnings will grow at an astonishing rate over the next few years. What I also know, however, is that Mr Soriot had better be quick, because deals such as the acquisition of the branded respiratory drug business of Actives in the US and Canada — which was announced on Thursday in the wake of disappointed Q4 results — won’t move the needle and won’t keep investors happy for long, either.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alessandro Pasetti has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended shares in Glaxo. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »