Why GlaxoSmithKline plc Is Down 17% This Year

Will 2015 be a better year for GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON:GSK) shareholders?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

It’s been a slightly uncomfortable year for GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) shareholders, who have watched their firm’s shares underperform the FTSE 100 by a significant margin, falling 17% compared to the FTSE’s more modest decline of 5%.

A year isn’t very long, but Glaxo hasn’t done very well over the last five years, either: as I write, Glaxo’s share price is just 3% higher than it was five years ago. That’s pretty poor, considering that the FTSE has gained 23% over the same period.

A bad year?

In fairness to Glaxo, it’s only really in 2014 that the pharma firm has seriously dropped behind the wider market.

The year started quite well, with news of a complex asset-swap deal with Novartis, which should strengthen both companies’ portfolios when it completes in the first half of next year.

The deal also includes an 82p per share capital return for Glaxo shareholders, and was well-received by the market.

News of a Serious Fraud Office into the firm’s sales practices was less impressive, but markets tend to brush over this kind of misconduct unless it affects the bottom line.

The real problem…

The real trouble started in July, when Glaxo published its interim results. Operating profit fell by 27% during the first half of the year, while earnings per share were down 34%. Although these falls were made worse by currency fluctuations, the underlying figures weren’t great, either.

Glaxo warned that a lack of free cash flow meant that share buybacks were likely to tail off during the second half of this year, and said that full-year adjusted earnings were no expected to be similar to 2013.

The shares fell by 12% in two weeks.

Will 2015 be better?

The pharma business can be very profitable: the UK’s three biggest firms, Glaxo, AstraZeneca and Shire have an average operating profit margin of 25%.

Both Glaxo and AstraZeneca have struggled to overcome the impact of patent expiration on key products over the last couple of years, and this may continue to affect earnings for a little longer. However, I’m in no doubt that the medium to long-term outlook for big pharma stocks is very attractive: this remains a genuine growth sector.

Seen in this light, Glaxo’s 2015 forecast P/E of 14.3 and prospective yield of 6.0% look extremely tempting, and the firm remains on my buy list for 2015.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland Head owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »