Will GlaxoSmithKline plc And AstraZeneca plc Make You Rich In 2015?

AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) thrashed GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) in 2014, but Harvey Jones says their roles could reverse next year

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

After falling 14% in 2014, GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) certainly won’t have made you rich this year.

AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) has put on a spectacular show, by contrast, rising 26% this year.

Glaxo loses, Astra wins. But who will come top in 2015?

All That Glisters

Glaxo is due a good year. Its shares are up just over 3% over five years, a shockingly poor performance from a FTSE 100 stalwart.

A couple of years ago, AstraZeneca was thought to be the one in trouble, thanks to falling profits and a failing drugs pipeline. Now it’s the UK pharma golden boy, up 60% over five years. Astra has the momentum, but Glaxo tempts my contrarian instincts.

Troubled Times

Glaxo has been caught up in the recent sell-off, taking its price/earnings ratio to below 12 and its yield to a tempting 6%. Given the shrinking chance of a base rate hike next year, it is almost worth buying on income alone.

Management is frantically restructuring, as it looks to put the bribery scandal behind it, reverse falling US revenues, and focus on its core disease areas such as respiratory, infectious diseases, vaccines and consumer healthcare.

Earnings per share (EPS) look set to fall 18% this year, but are forecast to claw their way back to zero in 2015.

Recovery play

Glaxo has a big job on its hands, especially with a recent drop in R&D productivity, and a hefty debt-to-equity ratio of 2.57. The key question is whether it can reverse its sliding earnings. That’s in the balance right now.

But if Glaxo does show Astra-like powers of recovery, it could make you rich in 2015 and beyond.

Astra Ascendant

The numbers look far nicer at AstraZeneca, with strong share price growth, a 4% yield, 14.4% operating margins, and 33% return-on-capital employed.

The only blot is a Glaxo-like 17% drop in EPS this year, followed by another 4% in 2015. Every time another patent expires, a little piece of Astra’s EPS dies.

It needs to keep the new drugs flowing, but there is good news on that score, with 107 projects in the clinical phase of development.

At 14 times earnings, Astra is valued more highly than Glaxo, and rightly so. These two companies have undergone a dramatic role reversal lately. Glaxo is now the riskier stock, but at today’s reduced price, potentially more rewarding.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Harvey Jones has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »