Why You Should Avoid Standard Chartered PLC, Banco Santander SA And Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc

Standard Chartered PLC (LON: STAN), Banco Santander SA (LON: BNC) and Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (LON: RBS) should all be avoided.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Personally, I’ve never been a big fan of banks, they’re just too difficult to understand. Many other market participants share this view, including Terry Smith, who used to be one of the City’s most respected banking analysts. 

However, while I’m cautious about the banking sector as a whole, there are three banks in particular that I believe all investors should avoid. 

Crippling impairments 

Standard Chartered (LSE: STAN) is at the top of my list. I have praised Standard before but no it’s becoming clear that the bank’s troubles are spiralling out of control.

Standard’s management announced that total impairment charges, or bad debts during the third quarter had jumped to $539m, more than double the figure reported for the same period a year ago. Total impairments for the year to the end of the third quarter hit $1.6bn and operating profit for the quarter fell 16% year on year. 

Unfortunately, it’s possible that another wave of impairments could be about to hit the bank, causing crippling losses. Specifically, management noted that third quarter impairments were a result of:

“…a small number of accounts, primarily in the Corporate and Institutional Clients segment, some of which have been affected by weak commodity markets…”

Since the third quarter commodity prices have only deteriorated, implying that the bank is set for further losses as clients struggle with adverse market conditions. 

Business Overhaul 

Banco Santander (LSE: BNC) (NYSE: SAN.US) is attractive due to the bank’s hefty dividend yield, which currently stands at 8.3%. However, Santander is being shaken to the core by its new executive chairman, Ana BotĂ­n as she reshuffles the management team. She has appointed a new CEO, JosĂ© Antonio Álvarez, a veteran banker who knows Santander inside out and is highly respected by the banking community.

Mr Álvarez used to hold the position of CFO at the bank and his promotion has sparked rumours that Santander is about to strengthen its capital structure, or reshuffle its financial strategy. Simply put, financial analysts, both here and over in Spain, believe that Santander could be about to announce a dividend cut, capital raising, or asset sales to bolster its financial cushion. 

So, for the time being Santander should be avoided until management’s overhaul is complete. 

Bankers can’t count

And lastly, Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) (NYSE: RBS.US), which has failed investors constantly since 2008. The bank’s latest failure, was the admission that the numbers used for the European Central Bank’s stress tests, conducted this year, were wrong. Indeed, the original figures supplied by RBS suggested that the bank’s tier one ratio would fall to 6.7% by 2016, in an adverse situation — a three year simulated period of stress — comfortably above the minimum figure required of 5.5%. 

However, a few weeks later the bank admitted that it had miscalculated the figures. After recalculating, RBS revealed that its stressed capital ratio was in fact 5.7%, not the previously stated 6.7% — a huge miscalculation.

This revelation has left me wondering, if RBS can’t get its figures right for one of the most anticipated events of the banking calendar, how many times has the bank made this mistake in the past? Moreover, what’s to stop the bank making more mistakes like this in future?

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »