New-Look Stamp Duty Could Kill Mansion Tax

Osborne claims that 98% of homebuyers will benefit from the overhaul.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

The hated stamp duty land tax is such a badly designed, universally reviled tax that it’s amazing no politician has got round to reforming it before.

Chancellor George Osborne has finally sorted out the mess, and is so proud of himself, he made it the final flourish in today’s Autumn Statement.

It makes you wonder why he didn’t get round to it before.

Osborne claims that 98% of homebuyers will benefit from the overhaul, and hopes they will thank him come the general election next May.

But that’s not his only political goal: he is keen to twist the knife into Ed Miliband’s proposed new mansion tax as well.

 

Good Politics, Bad Practice

Miliband may still press ahead with his plans, on the assumption that there is still plenty of mileage in bashing the rich. 

Which there no doubt is.

But even if you think bashing the rich is a good thing, the mansion tax is a bad way to do it. A more sensible method would be to reform the antiquated council tax system, which lets rich property owners off lightly.

 

Klass Warfare

The proposed tax will be charged on properties worth more than £2 million. But properties around this threshold will have to be valued, regularly, by an army of surveyors.

There’s plenty of scope for owners to fiddle the system, say, by dividing expensive homes into flats.

Grannies who have lived in family houses for years will suddenly have to pay a hefty tax bill from what may be minimal income. You don’t have to be Myleene Klass to work that out.

In fact, the mansion tax is so muddled, it made stamp duty look almost sensible.

 

Bands On The Run

From midnight, stamp duty will make a lot more sense.

Osborne is finally scrapping the “slab” nature of the tax, which meant that somebody buying a property for £250,000 would pay £2,500, but the bill would triple to £7,500 if the home cost just £1 more.

This distorted behaviour around each price band. The tax will now only be charged on the proportion of the property that falls over each band, rather than the total sale price.

 

Stamp It Out

The new starter stamp duty rate of 2% will kick in at £125,000, but only for the portion of the property’s sale price that falls over that threshold.

Buyers will pay 2% on the portion up to £250,000, then 5% up to £925,000, 10% up to £1.5 million, and 12% on everything above that.

Osborne assures us that only those buying houses more than £937,000 will pay more than they did before, so he can also claim to be soaking the rich.

But the wealthy won’t be complaining quite so loudly, because unlike the mansion tax, they only pay stamp duty once, rather than every year.

And they’ll be cheering if Osborne’s political manoeuvring does achieve its ulterior aim of putting the mansion tax to the sword.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »