3 Reasons Why BP plc Is Better Value Than BG Group plc

BG Group plc (LON:BG) has fallen hard, but does it offer better value than BP plc (LON:BP)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

BP (LSE: BP) (NYSE: BP.US) shares are trading at their lowest levels since May 2012, and are down by nearly 15% from their July peak. BG Group (LSE: BG) (NASDAQOTH: BRGYY.US) has fared even worse, sliding by nearly 30% this year.

After such major declines, both companies seem likely to offer value to investors looking for a recovery buy — but is this true, and if so, which company offers the best value?

The simple answer?

Using conventional metrics such as forecast yield and P/E, the answer might seem obvious — BP is clearly cheaper than BG:

 

BP

BG

2015 forecast P/E

9.3

13.0

2015 forecast yield

6.2%

2.4%

2015 forecast earnings growth

+1.8%

-1.0%

Price to book value

0.95

1.4

However, when it comes to resources companies, these basic financial metrics don’t always tell the whole story.

The big problem with BG over the last few years has been that its success as an explorer has not yet been matched by its ability to develop and generate cash from its assets. In theory, this means that BG’s earnings have not reflected the potential of its assets.

On the other hand, BP has proved very able to generate cash from its assets, both by maximising production and by selling them. The problem for BP is different: a multi-billion payout for the Macondo disaster continues to hang over the firm, while its decision to buy a 20% stake in Russian giant Rosneft no longer looks quite so clever, at least in the near future.

A different view

The core value of a resources company is defined by two things: its assets and their ability to be commercially exploited.

Assets that have proven commercial viability are known as reserves, and by comparing the valuation of BG and BP’s proved reserves, we can get an alternative view on which company offers better value:

 

BP

BG

Proved oil reserves (million barrels)

9,882

1,532

Proved natural gas reserves (billion cubic feet)

45,975

12,041

Total proved reserves (million barrels of oil equivalent)

17,544

3,538

Enterprise Value/boe of proved reserves

$5.16

$10.83

Source: Company annual reports

I have to admit I was surprised when I calculated these numbers: I really thought they would be closer.

On this basis, BP continues to look much cheaper than BG — and this conclusion is backed up by the company’s own discounted cash flow valuations for their proved reserves:

 

BP

BG

Market cap

£75bn

£31bn

Discounted future cash flow valuation for proved reserves

£80bn

£18bn

Source: company annual reports

Again, it’s clear that BG’s own figures suggest it is overvalued, relative to BP. However, I should point out that these figures were calculated assuming oil prices of $108. The picture could change sharply when they are recalculated for lower oil prices at the end of this year — but my money is still on BP as a strong buy.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland Head has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »