Blinkx Plc Crashes To New 52-Week Low

Is there any way back for ex-growth-star Blinkx Plc (LON: BLNX)?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

If you’re an investor in high-risk growth companies, you might not be feeling too good right now — not if you invested in Quindell and Blinkx (LSE: BLNX) at least.

I went for both of them for the Fool’s Beginners’ Portfolio, though at least it wasn’t with real money (although professionally it still hurts). I dumped Quindell very quickly for what seemed like obvious reasons, but Blinkx is my other growth loser.

Blinkx looked set to bring smart new software to targeted video-based advertising, and the markets liked what they saw — and the share priced soared to more than 225p by November 2013.

Then came some scathing criticism of Blinkx, and the company has been under a sustained shorting attack ever since. We’ve seen the share price crash from that 225p high to as low as 23.75p as I write, and it even dipped further to a new 52-week low of 23.25p earlier in the day.

Were the bears right?

A key short seller was revealed last week as being Caymans-based hedge fund Tiger Global, which coincidentally has also been behind some major shorting of Quindell.

On top of that, Blinkx looks like it has been proving the bears right, at least partly. In first-half figures released on 11 November, the company revealed a pre-tax loss of $9.7m, down from a profit of $10.8m in the first six months of the previous year. Adjusted figures showed a loss of $3.4m against a profit of $15.2m.

That came after revenue for the period dropped 5%, which in the face of it is not that dramatic — but it’s not really what you want from a high-tech growth stock that’s supposed to be in its ramping-up phase, and when that initial move into profit is reversed so quickly, it’s not surprising if investors take flight.

Part of the problem is that Blinkx has failed to make the transition with its technology from desktop computing to mobile devices, with mobile revenues having climbed to 20% of total spend from 1% year-on-year. If you think the same as I do, you’ll surely agree that’s a shocking oversight!

Transforming already?

Commenting on the figures, chief executive S. Brian Mukherjee told us it is a “transformational period” for Blinkx, and that’s really not what shareholders want to hear so early in a company’s growth phase — it’s the way bosses of stumbling old dinosaurs talk when they realise the world has caught up and overtaken them.

Mr Mukherjee did say that Blinkx has moved to “target growth areas of the sector, particularly video, mobile and programmatic trading” in order to “become a leading provider of premium cross-screen advertising at scale“.

I really don’t know if Blinkx has what it takes now to recapture the initiative in such a fast-moving and high-tech business. But I am convinced it will either reboot its growth and reward new investors handsomely, or will dwindle to nothing — I don’t see a lot of middle ground here.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »