AstraZeneca plc And GlaxoSmithKline plc Are Strong Buys, But For Very Different Reasons

AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) have their differences, but there is strength in diversity, says Harvey Jones

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

 

AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) and GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) have both had massively differing fortunes over the past year. 

Astra couldn’t have risen faster, its share price up 40% in the last year. Glaxo couldn’t have been more slow, its share price down almost 15% in a year.

Yet both stocks look tempting today, if you approach them from very different angles.

Faster Astra

AstraZeneca’s steady recovery continues apace, according to recent Q3 results, with both revenues and earnings at the higher end of expectations. Sales rose strongly in the US and emerging markets, while its three core franchises, Brilinta, respiratory and diabetes, posted an impressive 38% rise in sales.

AstraZeneca’s pipeline was once a worry, but is now stuffed with 121 products, of which 107 are in the clinical phase of development, with potential sales of anything between $23bn and $63bn a year.

Yet its share price recovery is partly down to investor suspicions that US giant Pfizer will return to table another bid. That may explain why it is just 4% below its 52-week high of 4845p.

I don’t like buying on takeover talk, but would rather invest in the company’s long-term future as a science-led, research-driven pure pharmaceutical group.

On that basis, its long-term prospects look strong.

Go-Slow Glaxo

AZN isn’t cheap any more, however, trading a 14.4 times earnings, and yielding 3.8%. If you want a cut-price recovery play, Glaxo, rather embarrassingly, finds itself in that position.

At today’s 1411p, it is 17% below its 52-week high. That leaves it trading at just 12.6 times earnings, incredibly cheap for what is supposedly one of the most solid stocks on the FTSE 100. Even better, it yields a whopping 5.5%.

I wish it was all down to that China bribery scandal, but Q3 results showed a worrying 10% drop in US pharmaceuticals and vaccines turnover to $1.27bn, and a 2% drop in Europe.

Glaxo has now taken Astra’s place as a troubled recovery play, and a return to form could take some time, given sluggish predicted earnings per share growth of just 2% in 2015.

But it is also putting its faith in R&D, predicting a sustained flow of new pharmaceutical products over the next five to 10 years.

Road To Recovery

Each stock presents a very different investment case today. But the long-term result should be the same: steady, long-term income and growth from two research-led blue-chip giants.

AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline are in a different place right now, but ultimately heading in the same direction.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Harvey Jones has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »