How Barclays PLC Turned £10k Into Just £6.8k…

Barclays PLC (LON: BARC) didn’t need a bailout, but would still have lost you a packet.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

BarclaysI’ve been looking at the total returns made by some of our top FTSE 100 companies recently, and it was quite a shock to see the 65% loss that a Lloyds Banking Group investment would have made with all dividends reinvested.

That made me wonder how the other banks, the ones that didn’t need a taxpayer bailout, would have fared, so I’ve been doing the sums for Barclays (LSE: BARC) (NYSE: BCS.US), too. Although there was no bailout, Barclays has suffered a number of penalties due to past misdeeds and there are fears there may be more to come — and that will be depressing the price today.

A 54% slump!

If you’d bought Barclays shares at the end of September 2004, you’d have had to pay 490p apiece for them. And a couple of years later, with the price hovering around 620p, you’d probably have been feeling pretty pleased with yourself — especially as you’d have had a couple of years of 5% dividend yields lining your pockets too.

But that would have been the end of the happy days, and by 2011 your shares would have crashed to under 140p and dividends would have been slashed.

The price has recovered since then to 226p as I write, but that’s still a loss of 54% over 10 years — £10,000 invested in 2004 would be worth only £4,612 now.

Dividends

The dividend situation at Barclays turned pretty desperate, but you would still have had some cash to help counter your capital loss a little — £3,047, in fact, and that would lift your final pot to £7,659.

You’d still have been down 23%, but that’s much better than that 54% capital loss alone.

What if you’d done what most people would think wise and reinvested your dividends each year instead of spending the cash? Well, with the share price having slumped so much you’d have bought most of your new shares at prices higher than today. The recent mini-recovery would have helped offset the damage, but you’d have lost £874 of your dividend cash.

You’d be left with £6,785 for an overall loss of 32% — nasty, but if you never suffer a worse single-share catastrophe in your investing career, you really won’t have done too badly.

Diversify

As part of a diversified portfolio held with a long-term view, you really wouldn’t have been too badly hurt by Barclays — as long as you weren’t holding Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland, too!

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »